Date: Fri, 12 Jul 2024 16:41:38 +0200 Mime-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Subject: Re: Langevin's paradox again Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity References: <9oTvw4-YSIPb1dubtdBwcc_MeX8@jntp> <4O9Y8U3gtfBKakbkPS0LmREorbI@jntp> Content-Language: pl From: Maciej Wozniak In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Lines: 13 Path: ...!npeer.as286.net!npeer-ng0.as286.net!peer02.ams1!peer.ams1.xlned.com!news.xlned.com!peer03.ams4!peer.am4.highwinds-media.com!news.highwinds-media.com!feeder.usenetexpress.com!tr2.eu1.usenetexpress.com!news.newsdemon.com!not-for-mail Nntp-Posting-Date: Fri, 12 Jul 2024 14:41:38 +0000 Organization: NewsDemon - www.newsdemon.com X-Complaints-To: abuse@newsdemon.com Message-Id: <17e17e34e3993dde$70085$505029$c2365abb@news.newsdemon.com> X-Received-Bytes: 1579 Bytes: 1706 W dniu 12.07.2024 o 16:39, Richard Hachel pisze: > Le 12/07/2024 à 15:24, "Paul.B.Andersen" a écrit : >> Den 11.07.2024 20:29, skrev Richard Hachel: > >> So why do you claim that SR is wrong? > > That's not what I'm saying. > Many things physicists say are correct. > In this sense, SR is not false "in principle". Oh, yes, it is. The mumble of your idiot guru was not even consistent.