Date: Wed, 21 Aug 2024 11:07:14 +0200
Mime-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Subject: Re: Sync two clocks
Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity
References: <u18wy1Hl3tOo1DpOF6WVSF0s-08@jntp> <v9nant$1d2us$1@dont-email.me> <vPP1Z1BJfE1Dt7SYhCzEo7ZQWFI@jntp> <va0a4f$30p95$1@dont-email.me> <Zwwc8OsxqpAwTzvPkie6NmgxmY8@jntp> <va1tp9$3c0qh$1@dont-email.me> <lvwOM_tj8NJtPtaduqcmSRprOtk@jntp> <va2b62$3c12c$15@dont-email.me> <gQSP7T04xKx9wgapoySeijcbJi4@jntp> <va2cu7$3c12c$17@dont-email.me> <-RLU4Hb-vC0H6CrJfdC09_wtGwc@jntp> <va2fsa$3c12c$22@dont-email.me> <17ed7d30c4e76fab$456468$546728$c2565adb@news.newsdemon.com> <va2h20$3c12c$24@dont-email.me> <17ed80f088336682$489177$505064$c2265aab@news.newsdemon.com> <va46ai$3p3aa$5@dont-email.me>
Content-Language: pl
From: Maciej Wozniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl>
In-Reply-To: <va46ai$3p3aa$5@dont-email.me>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Lines: 57
Path: ...!news.misty.com!weretis.net!feeder9.news.weretis.net!usenet.blueworldhosting.com!diablo1.usenet.blueworldhosting.com!tr2.iad1.usenetexpress.com!feeder.usenetexpress.com!tr2.eu1.usenetexpress.com!news.newsdemon.com!not-for-mail
Nntp-Posting-Date: Wed, 21 Aug 2024 09:07:14 +0000
X-Received-Bytes: 2868
Organization: NewsDemon - www.newsdemon.com
X-Complaints-To: abuse@newsdemon.com
Message-Id: <17edb32c4025a399$493382$505064$c2265aab@news.newsdemon.com>
Bytes: 3290

W dniu 21.08.2024 o 09:51, Python pisze:
> Le 20/08/2024 à 19:46, Maciej Wozniak a écrit :
>> W dniu 20.08.2024 o 18:42, Python pisze:
>>> Le 20/08/2024 à 18:38, Maciej Wozniak a écrit :
>>>> W dniu 20.08.2024 o 18:22, Python pisze:
>>>>> Le 20/08/2024 à 18:18, M.D. Richard "Hachel" Lengrand a écrit :
>>>>>> Le 20/08/2024 à 17:32, Python a écrit :
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> In short, for A, tB and tA' are simultaneous.
>>>>>>>> I repeat, for A, tB and tA' are simultaneous.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Numbers like t_B or t'_A cannot be "simultaneous". Events
>>>>>>> like e1 = "B sends back a light signal to A" or e2 = "A receives
>>>>>>> this signal" can be.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> If this is what you meant, which is likely, then, according
>>>>>>> to Einstein-Poincaré *definition* of simultaneity:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> e1 and e2 are NOT simultaneous for A (nor for B)
>>>>>>
>>>>>> No.
>>>>>
>>>>> According to Einstein-Poincaré definition of simultaneity
>>>>> they are not simultaneous.
>>>>>
>>>>> However you like or not this *definition* this is something
>>>>> you CANNOT deny.
>>>>>
>>>>> A definition cannot be false. 
>>>>
>>>> If your idiot guru defined a cow as a 6 leg
>>>> small animal with chitine armour - would it
>>>> be "not false" to you as well, poor halfbrain?
>>>>
>>>
>>> Who knows? 
>>
>> You surely don't. Or maybe you do and you
>> will answer
>>
> 
> I could. This would mean that I take you seriously.


Rather, that would mean you're sticking out
your  dumb, fanatic ass and ask me to spank
it. No  surprise you won't.


And whatever you say - Poincare had enough wit
to understand how idiotic rejecting Euclid
would be, and he has written it clearly
enough for anyone able to read (even if not
clearly enough for you, poor stinker).