Date: Mon, 4 Nov 2024 14:31:01 +0100 Mime-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Subject: Re: Lots of Christian Atheists here, ain't they? Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity References: <6721E640.73FF@ix.netcom.com> <299cf6e3e18f97e68f3d41b13e9d5740@www.novabbs.com> <672891ff$0$29733$426a74cc@news.free.fr> Content-Language: pl From: Maciej Wozniak In-Reply-To: <672891ff$0$29733$426a74cc@news.free.fr> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Lines: 37 Path: ...!news.roellig-ltd.de!open-news-network.org!weretis.net!feeder8.news.weretis.net!usenet.goja.nl.eu.org!news.furie.org.uk!piper.furie.org.uk!usenet.blueworldhosting.com!diablo1.usenet.blueworldhosting.com!tr1.iad1.usenetexpress.com!feeder.usenetexpress.com!tr2.eu1.usenetexpress.com!news.newsdemon.com!not-for-mail Nntp-Posting-Date: Mon, 04 Nov 2024 13:31:01 +0000 X-Received-Bytes: 2306 X-Complaints-To: abuse@newsdemon.com Organization: NewsDemon - www.newsdemon.com Message-Id: <1804c7179d5f3206$361491$977218$c2265aab@news.newsdemon.com> Bytes: 2814 W dniu 04.11.2024 o 10:21, J. J. Lodder pisze: > Athel Cornish-Bowden wrote: > >> On 2024-10-31 18:54:56 +0000, kazu said: >> >>> LaurenceClarkCrossen wrote: >>>> Dawn Flood: "solitary cranks" is only a case of ad populum fallacy. >>> >>> >>> as much as i would like to believe there is a super genius rebel among >>> us who is decades ahead of his peers, good will is not hunting here. >> >> There are several self-proclaimed super geniuses among us: not only >> LaurenceClarkCrossen, but also "Dr" Hachel, Arindam Banerjee (otherwise >> known as bertietaylor), Wozniak (the greatest logician humanity has >> ever known), rhertz, the Starmaker. All crackpots. Why is this group >> such a magnet for nutters? Not even talk.origins has so many. > > Indeed, the regulars in t.o. are even complaining > about a lack of nutters. > > This is understandable. Unlike the nutters here, > who are merely against it all, the t.o. nutters > had a more or less coherent alternative theory. > (Intelligent Design) > > With the collapse of intelligent design much of the nuttery collapsed. > (as you well know) > The nutterdom here has no such claim at respectability. > They don't have an alternative to teach. > So, beig pure nuttery, it is less prone to collapse. It would be sure much better and easier for relativistic doggies to fight me if I had some idiocies comparable to theirs.