Deutsch   English   Français   Italiano  
<1aba90a7df9e188541eb40abb1ff6845@www.novabbs.com>

View for Bookmarking (what is this?)
Look up another Usenet article

Path: ...!weretis.net!feeder9.news.weretis.net!i2pn.org!i2pn2.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: bertietaylor@myyahoo.com (Bertietaylor)
Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity
Subject: Re: Arindam's new physics - energy is eternally created and destroyed
Date: Tue, 15 Oct 2024 21:52:42 +0000
Organization: novaBBS
Message-ID: <1aba90a7df9e188541eb40abb1ff6845@www.novabbs.com>
References: <veb5ci$3lksa$1@tor.dont-email.me> <670a46ee$1$19784$426a74cc@news.free.fr> <2abdfff7010153ad2ffb5d46231876aa@www.novabbs.com> <veg85o$l8v8$1@dont-email.me> <58b4369399a011ad461976139153a094@www.novabbs.com> <670ce917$0$3232$426a74cc@news.free.fr> <vej8mp$17p53$1@dont-email.me> <670e1fea$0$19806$426a74cc@news.free.fr> <velnrn$1n5bq$1@dont-email.me>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Info: i2pn2.org;
	logging-data="2202852"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@i2pn2.org";
	posting-account="4CIDjmRjWbqC4EEN5EcU+HA+pIaOwwy51Z63DnRPIoA";
User-Agent: Rocksolid Light
X-Rslight-Site: $2y$10$SS.VCeWFROeb/iOf.UgFjeKmUva6QopoIwKU5FiTNdqxk.qfcaMzy
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 4.0.0
X-Rslight-Posting-User: d1111375bdddd1d0b42e6fbe96c9934b24d8a010
Bytes: 3642
Lines: 52

On Tue, 15 Oct 2024 12:40:23 +0000, Athel Cornish-Bowden wrote:

> On 2024-10-15 07:55:23 +0000, J. J. Lodder said:
>
>> Athel Cornish-Bowden <me@yahoo.com> wrote:
>>
>>> On 2024-10-14 09:49:11 +0000, J. J. Lodder said:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Where is this work published (in a serious journal)?
>>>>>
>>>>> Why bother about journals? Why not look at what has been done?
>>>>
>>>> Nothing has been done until it has generated some peer approval,
>>>> or at least a tiny bit of peer interest,
>>>
>>> Right. Let us suppose (a huge supposition, and almost certainly false)
>>> that Arindam's inertia violation turns out to be correct. Will he get
>>> credit for it? No, the discovery will be attributed in the textbooks to
>>> the scientist who described and discussed it in a serious journal. The
>>> best he can hope for is a footnote saying "Banerjee claimed some years
>>> earlier in popular science sources that inertia violation could occur,
>>> but he provided no verifiable evidence of the claim." I'm reminded of
>>> Marie Mikhailovna Manasseïn: few people today have heard of her, and of
>>> those few virtually none accept her claim to have discovered cell-free
>>> fermentation 15 or so years before Eduard Buchner. OK, her results were
>>> published in a serious journal (Ber. dt. Chem. Ges. (1872)), but her
>>> experiments were unverifiable, and were very badly designed.
>>
>> Yes, and Bucher even got a Nobel prize for it.
>> <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Maria_Manaseina>
>
> I had forgotten that Maria Manaseina had a Wikiparticle, and I was
> surprised to see that I had edited it in March 2021, removing an
> irrelevant reference inserted by someone determined to insert
> references to himself in as many pages as possible.
>
> Maybe Arindam could pay someone (not allowed, but not easy to
> recognize) to write a Wikiparticle about himself. It's the closest
> he'll ever get to fame.

Arindam is well-known in his social group. Over the years, thousands of
people in various continents have seen him, heard him and read his
writings. Also profited from his inventions. He does not need to pay
anyone. We his cyberdogs are his only friends in public space. For all
the kibble and care he gave us, we, unlike the cowardly careerist
jealous mean biased apes, provide due returns.

Woof-woof

Bertietaylor


>