Path: ...!feeds.phibee-telecom.net!2.eu.feeder.erje.net!feeder.erje.net!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Michael S <already5chosen@yahoo.com>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.c
Subject: Re: Which newsgroup for json parsing?
Date: Tue, 28 May 2024 14:45:09 +0300
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 29
Message-ID: <20240528144509.00002562@yahoo.com>
References: <la1bjoF2anmU1@mid.individual.net>
	<v25c4k$1lhfu$1@dont-email.me>
	<lamvvbFb0g2U1@mid.individual.net>
	<v2aa1g$2q337$1@dont-email.me>
	<lbjaepFm1vbU1@mid.individual.net>
	<v32pr7$6p6f$1@dont-email.me>
	<lblq6uF2jrcU1@mid.individual.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Injection-Date: Tue, 28 May 2024 13:45:00 +0200 (CEST)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="14313ffd129ddac4bff0d9eb9d968071";
	logging-data="538708"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1+JIswqu9SOb6vzpAz8ikkBkHt9u73CiyI="
Cancel-Lock: sha1:PhHZP+3nzH5icO9l/XreDpCgU0A=
X-Newsreader: Claws Mail 3.19.1 (GTK+ 2.24.33; x86_64-w64-mingw32)
Bytes: 2281

On Tue, 28 May 2024 12:33:02 +0200
Josef M=C3=B6llers <josef@invalid.invalid> wrote:

> On 27.05.24 22:18, Vir Campestris wrote:
> > On 27/05/2024 12:51, Josef M=C3=B6llers wrote: =20
> >>
> >> In my 40+ years of experience in IT/programming (I graduated 1981
> >> from a Dutch polytechnic "HIO" in Computer Science and have
> >> retired in 2022) I have learnt that "works fine" is only part of
> >> the work. Maintainability should be added as well. Even if it is
> >> code written for one's personal use only, it may need some work
> >> later and then it's crucial to have it maintainable.
> >>
> >> But maybe you think so too, =20
> >=20
> > I agree completely.
> >=20
> > I learned my lesson a a student with a personal project which I
> > left for 6 months. When I came back to it I had to comment it
> > before I could carry on. =20
>=20
> You will never have enough comments, even when you consider this rule
> ;-)
>=20

Probably true.=20
And despite that you can very easily have too much (or too many?)
comments.