Deutsch English Français Italiano |
<20240905143630.000021b8@yahoo.com> View for Bookmarking (what is this?) Look up another Usenet article |
Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Michael S <already5chosen@yahoo.com> Newsgroups: comp.arch Subject: Re: Fortran was NOT higher level than C. Was: Computer architects leaving Intel... Date: Thu, 5 Sep 2024 14:36:30 +0300 Organization: A noiseless patient Spider Lines: 13 Message-ID: <20240905143630.000021b8@yahoo.com> References: <2024Aug30.161204@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at> <memo.20240830164247.19028y@jgd.cix.co.uk> <vasruo$id3b$1@dont-email.me> <2024Aug30.195831@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at> <vat5ap$jthk$2@dont-email.me> <vaunhb$vckc$1@dont-email.me> <vautmu$vr5r$1@dont-email.me> <2024Aug31.170347@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at> <vavpnh$13tj0$2@dont-email.me> <vb00c2$150ia$1@dont-email.me> <505954890d8461c1f4082b1beecd453c@www.novabbs.org> <vb0kh2$12ukk$1@dont-email.me> <vb3smg$1ta6s$1@dont-email.me> <vb4q5o$12ukk$3@dont-email.me> <vb6a16$38aj5$1@dont-email.me> <jwv8qw8o7zg.fsf-monnier+comp.arch@gnu.org> <vb7q5q$3f6cg$1@dont-email.me> <20240904113123.00002098@yahoo.com> <vba46k$3te58$1@dont-email.me> <20240905130424.00001218@yahoo.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Injection-Date: Thu, 05 Sep 2024 13:35:47 +0200 (CEST) Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="d1c3954e3e75afc5b6e38dec83749501"; logging-data="3944887"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1+IW17NK4L9UgfYndKZ66svTJqzzLjEXkI=" Cancel-Lock: sha1:NZdipCmDsqenxnXY0HlSkve01FM= X-Newsreader: Claws Mail 3.19.1 (GTK+ 2.24.33; x86_64-w64-mingw32) Bytes: 2215 On Thu, 5 Sep 2024 13:04:24 +0300 Michael S <already5chosen@yahoo.com> wrote: > > I don't know much about typical users of Modern Fortran, but would > think that those coming from other languages, esp. from Python, would > appreciate built-in infinite-precision integers Somehow I feel that both "infinite-precision integers" and "arbitrary precision integers" are both misnomers. But they are established terms and I don't know how to express it better. May be, "arbitrary range" ?