Path: ...!weretis.net!feeder8.news.weretis.net!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Ruud Harmsen <rh@rudhar.com>
Newsgroups: sci.lang
Subject: Re: Remnant of the future
Date: Sat, 06 Apr 2024 09:27:55 +0200
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 16
Message-ID: <39u11jdemkrit66korhjukug3u3ihbh0de@4ax.com>
References: <o9ai0j1mhql0eupat9fvo7nsi876v8jk2i@4ax.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Date: Sat, 06 Apr 2024 07:27:55 +0200 (CEST)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="27508285931e8c618b6b81f2ea9722a9";
	logging-data="2065462"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1+vgp6LnfdYr+UeXNre3Bn/"
Cancel-Lock: sha1:YD0CrnYMzoaBWt3P2EgS8vMd7qo=
X-Newsreader: Forte Agent 1.93/32.576 English (American)
Bytes: 1590

Sun, 31 Mar 2024 11:21:23 +0200: Ruud Harmsen <rh@rudhar.com>
scribeva:

>https://www.facebook.com/groups/2166033293623124/posts/4074111876148580
>"the only trace of [the Latin future tense] is one form, in one
>language, with a different function, namely Spanish eres ‘you are’
>(sing.), "
>
>Fascinating! What about Portuguese 'es'? Is it an exact copy of the
>Latin word, or also eris or eres with a later elided r?
>https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/eres#Spanish

I meant és, of course, in the correct spelling. Second person singular
of the verb 'ser'. Qual a etimologia?
-- 
Ruud Harmsen, https://rudhar.com