Path: ...!weretis.net!feeder9.news.weretis.net!feeder8.news.weretis.net!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!individual.net!not-for-mail From: "Carlos E.R." Newsgroups: comp.mobile.android Subject: Re: Steps counting apps Date: Sat, 18 May 2024 17:12:06 +0200 Lines: 25 Message-ID: <63tmhkx76t.ln2@Telcontar.valinor> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Trace: individual.net JfilWQP5fVi2U/UV9yg/2wrAiiaGY8tqx2piDaOChxttcOhxN+ X-Orig-Path: Telcontar.valinor!not-for-mail Cancel-Lock: sha1:HO08K/O9lbknqFsK+6SVA84oLVY= sha256:s0+fww0XQs5aveZPdJdG/YqQs7HqqNxLLXzRXTSDETY= User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Content-Language: es-ES, en-CA In-Reply-To: Bytes: 1886 On 2024-05-16 16:16, Jörg Lorenz wrote: > On 16.05.24 14:54, Carlos E.R. wrote: >> On 2024-05-16 11:43, Jim the Geordie wrote: >>> Just out of curiosity I thought I might try a STEPS counter app. >>> Many seem to come with all sorts of health monitoring extras, which I'm >>> not bothered about, but happy to enter and not use. >>> However there are massive differences between them on the numbers of >>> steps they claim I have taken and some don't appear to work at all. >>> I'm not wanting to start a thread about the health benefits, just to >>> find the simplest, accurate, free one. >> >> A cheap smart watch will do it easily and accurately. > > Jim asked for an app on his *Android phone*. I am aware. > By far not everyone wants to wear one of these ugly and for all visible > "watches". And btw they are not more accurate than a smartphone. Having used both, I disagree. -- Cheers, Carlos.