Path: ...!news-out.netnews.com!postmaster.netnews.com!us1.netnews.com!not-for-mail X-Trace: DXC=bIATMA282@ZITXUL480YCWU5[F2hIijD_7J470dMQQ7[J4R`5ADBYnRCODD059b9o_1A?EK]8;W0[E7V X-Complaints-To: support@frugalusenet.com Date: Tue, 28 May 2024 16:02:38 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Subject: Re: OT: 'Peer Reviewed' Papers - a new scam! Newsgroups: sci.electronics.design References: Content-Language: en-US From: bitrex In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Lines: 27 Message-ID: <6656385e$6$1258324$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: 127.0.0.1 X-Trace: 1716926558 reader.netnews.com 1258324 127.0.0.1:45415 Bytes: 2112 On 5/27/2024 7:11 PM, Cursitor Doom wrote: > "This ongoing degradation calls for a shift from traditional peer review > to rigorous live debates, ensuring accountability by having people argue > their cases in real time." > > And not before time, say I. > > > https://www.zerohedge.com/markets/trust-sciencethat-just-retracted-11000- > peer-reviewed-papers I'm unsure if there have been any significant recent developments in conservative philosophy recently, but if there's been like, some paradigm-shifting discoveries in the field of wingnutology I'm open to reading the journals that contain them. But my impression has been that wingnutology is not shall we say a "highly nuanced philosophy" and that's one of the keys to its popularity, it doesn't need an academic journal to understand. Love guns, love Trump, have a long list of commies, queers, and degenerate enemies that need to get waxed, and you've basically got at least a bachelors of arts in the field at this time. what more is there to know about it. Park your pickup in a EV parking spot is the equivalent of a masters degree. Kick a queer or homeless person straight in the head and you got your PhD, easy.