Path: ...!news.mixmin.net!feeder1-2.proxad.net!proxad.net!feeder1-1.proxad.net!cleanfeed4-a.proxad.net!nnrp5-1.free.fr!not-for-mail Newsgroups: comp.os.linux.advocacy From: =?UTF-8?Q?St=C3=A9phane?= CARPENTIER Subject: Re: The problem with not owning the software References: <9OCcnRW7grqkbPT6nZ2dnZfqnPUAAAAA@earthlink.com> Organization: Mulots' Killer User-Agent: slrn/pre1.0.4-9 (Linux) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Date: 04 Jan 2025 18:01:50 GMT Lines: 19 Message-ID: <6779778d$0$28051$426a34cc@news.free.fr> NNTP-Posting-Date: 04 Jan 2025 19:01:50 CET NNTP-Posting-Host: 78.201.248.7 X-Trace: 1736013710 news-4.free.fr 28051 78.201.248.7:42456 X-Complaints-To: abuse@proxad.net Bytes: 2461 Le 04-01-2025, DFS a écrit : > > Which Linux distro offers perfect consistency? First, I'd say it's not the job of the distro. It's the job of the Window Manager. Now, the first time I installed Mint for someone else, I installed a few different WM to show that there is no better WM, there is only a WM which suit more the user. And they have to be tested to know which one to chose. I have to say it was disturbing to see they all look similar and I still don't know if I like it or not. So, Mint is not perfect, but it's the only one I know which offer real consistency. -- Si vous avez du temps à perdre : https://scarpet42.gitlab.io