| Deutsch English Français Italiano |
|
<86bk6mo5lp.fsf@example.com> View for Bookmarking (what is this?) Look up another Usenet article |
Path: ...!weretis.net!feeder8.news.weretis.net!newsfeed.xs3.de!nntp-feed.chiark.greenend.org.uk!ewrotcd!news.eyrie.org!beagle.ediacara.org!.POSTED.beagle.ediacara.org!not-for-mail
From: Richmond <dnomhcir@gmx.com>
Newsgroups: talk.origins
Subject: Re: Evidence v Conclusions
Date: Sat, 06 Apr 2024 16:47:46 +0100
Organization: Frantic
Sender: to%beagle.ediacara.org
Approved: moderator@beagle.ediacara.org
Message-ID: <86bk6mo5lp.fsf@example.com>
References: <1tf21jdg30uru7c2ossq8j6ifrqdcefh0l@4ax.com>
<86o7amocxq.fsf@example.com>
<ecbdbe72b12496cecb6d807b77b50cd8@www.novabbs.com>
<86frvyo80g.fsf@example.com>
<481bea446c3d6f3930fed32d0a94e807@www.novabbs.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Injection-Info: beagle.ediacara.org; posting-host="beagle.ediacara.org:3.132.105.89";
logging-data="61799"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@beagle.ediacara.org"
User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.2 (gnu/linux)
To: talk-origins@moderators.isc.org
Cancel-Lock: sha1:dmacR/J+hn2zaDcpAdf8fl2MPzQ= sha1:dWt/W4HOJMeSk0thILmJto2trCE=
Return-Path: <news@reader6.news.weretis.net>
X-Original-To: talk-origins@ediacara.org
Delivered-To: talk-origins@ediacara.org
id 56BCE22976C; Sat, 6 Apr 2024 11:47:55 -0400 (EDT)
by beagle.ediacara.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1F6D1229758
for <talk-origins@ediacara.org>; Sat, 6 Apr 2024 11:47:53 -0400 (EDT)
by moderators.individual.net (Exim 4.97)
for talk-origins@moderators.isc.org with esmtps (TLS1.3)
tls TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384
(envelope-from <news@reader6.news.weretis.net>)
id 1rt8Gr-00000002ukq-3YGf; Sat, 06 Apr 2024 17:47:57 +0200
(using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)
key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256)
(No client certificate requested)
by pmx.weretis.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B03373E87A
for <talk-origins@moderators.isc.org>; Sat, 6 Apr 2024 17:47:46 +0200 (CEST)
id 76FD73E866; Sat, 6 Apr 2024 17:47:46 +0200 (CEST)
X-User-ID: eJwFwYkBgDAIA8CV+JLIOC3K/iN4h6RzVAQLixVuMuzFhAz5qCJ7nSvTfpxTovk9jZZ34gf6ww/B
Bytes: 3262
Lines: 28
j.nobel.daggett@gmail.com (LDagget) writes:
> Richmond wrote:
>
>> j.nobel.daggett@gmail.com (LDagget) writes:
>
>>> That's quite false as there exist many different independent lines
>>> of evidence for the existence of electrons beyond modeling the flow of
>>> electricity.
>
>> Yes there are, but people often offer electricity, or worse still,
>> television, as evidence.
>
>>>
>>> Are you even aware of who JJ Thomson is? If so, do you understand
>
>> Oh it's you again. Are you even aware the standard model is a model?
>
> Cathode ray tubes don't produce models, they produce electron beams.
>
> The data interpretation doesn't require the standard model of particle
> physics. Neither do slit experiments. What it looks like is there's
> a lack of evidence that you understand either bit of evidence. Or have
> ever seen that evidence? I'm guessing you never looked. I guess as
> long as you play see no, hear no, speak no games, your
> assertion will survive your personal belief system.
What are you talking about you gormless fuckwit?