Path: ...!news.mixmin.net!sewer!alphared!2.eu.feeder.erje.net!feeder.erje.net!feeds.news.ox.ac.uk!news.ox.ac.uk!nntp-feed.chiark.greenend.org.uk!ewrotcd!news.eyrie.org!beagle.ediacara.org!.POSTED.beagle.ediacara.org!not-for-mail
From: j.nobel.daggett@gmail.com (LDagget)
Newsgroups: talk.origins
Subject: Re: Evidence v Conclusions
Date: Mon, 8 Apr 2024 12:18:09 +0000
Organization: novaBBS
Sender: to%beagle.ediacara.org
Approved: moderator@beagle.ediacara.org
Message-ID: <87c04ec77573ddab9f884a2a7ca32866@www.novabbs.com>
References: <1tf21jdg30uru7c2ossq8j6ifrqdcefh0l@4ax.com> <86o7amocxq.fsf@example.com> <krt31j1d78fmvou8enoqagn2hbv4lq3bci@4ax.com> <86ttkdbpal.fsf@example.com> <bs071jdvh72u5rguqsbb7u4b5s1rsk1sln@4ax.com> <86frvwukz7.fsf@example.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Info: beagle.ediacara.org; posting-host="beagle.ediacara.org:3.132.105.89";
	logging-data="36467"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@beagle.ediacara.org"
User-Agent: Rocksolid Light
To: talk-origins@moderators.isc.org
Return-Path: <news@i2pn2.org>
X-Original-To: talk-origins@ediacara.org
Delivered-To: talk-origins@ediacara.org
	id F2C3922976C; Mon,  8 Apr 2024 08:20:39 -0400 (EDT)
	by beagle.ediacara.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B7ED5229758
	for <talk-origins@ediacara.org>; Mon,  8 Apr 2024 08:20:37 -0400 (EDT)
          by moderators.individual.net (Exim 4.97)
          for talk-origins@moderators.isc.org with esmtp
          (envelope-from <news@i2pn2.org>)
          id 1rtnzQ-00000001jnx-0T40; Mon, 08 Apr 2024 14:20:44 +0200
	id 3FA3D598002; Mon,  8 Apr 2024 12:20:32 +0000 (UTC)
X-Injection-Info: ;
	posting-account="t+lO0yBNO1zGxasPvGSZV1BRu71QKx+JE37DnW+83jQ";
X-Rslight-Site: $2y$10$TlLnmBnl6YIjyNqBYWrJZu.S1vA5KhBVzxOx6R3LCsSg3FWD68EfK
X-Rslight-Posting-User: c5f6b781ff4ba2020b43295a6d215cc93d00a846
Bytes: 3796
Lines: 58

Richmond wrote:

> jillery <69jpil69@gmail.com> writes:


>>>The above is not nonsense. You think it is nonsense because you don't
>>>understand.
>>
>>
>> I understand quite well.

> It cannot be nonsense then can it?

>> The cited comments are mindless and infantile.

> The usual ad hominems, being the last resort of the incompetent.

>>
>> Your confusion about these things is likely a result of your ignorance
>> of relevant facts.

> More ad hominems. You are either a troll or you have been in this
> newsgroup so long you think this is normal behaviour.

Ahem. Quoting an earlier post.

 
BEGIN QUOTE 
> Richmond <dnomhcir@gmx.com> wrote:
>> j.nobel.daggett@gmail.com (LDagget) writes:
>> 
>>> Richmond wrote:
>>> 
>>>> j.nobel.daggett@gmail.com (LDagget) writes:
>>> 
>>>>> That's quite false as there exist many different independent lines
>>>>> of evidence for the existence of electrons beyond modeling the flow of
>>>>> electricity.
>>> 
>>>> Yes there are, but people often offer electricity, or worse still,
>>>> television, as evidence.
>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> Are you even aware of who JJ Thomson is? If so, do you understand
>>> 
>>>> Oh it's you again. Are you even aware the standard model is a model?
>>> 
>>> Cathode ray tubes don't produce models, they produce electron beams.
>>> 
>>> The data interpretation doesn't require the standard model of particle
>>> physics. Neither do slit experiments. What it looks like is there's
>>> a lack of evidence that you understand either bit of evidence. Or have
>>> ever seen that evidence? I'm guessing you never looked. I guess as
>>> long as you play see no, hear no, speak no games, your
>>> assertion will survive your personal belief system.
>> 
>> What are you talking about you gormless fuckwit?
END QUOTE