Deutsch   English   Français   Italiano  
<QmbtUtCrAoIUDH9TBoFvb7pvf84@jntp>

View for Bookmarking (what is this?)
Look up another Usenet article

Path: ...!news.nobody.at!weretis.net!feeder8.news.weretis.net!pasdenom.info!from-devjntp
Message-ID: <QmbtUtCrAoIUDH9TBoFvb7pvf84@jntp>
JNTP-Route: news2.nemoweb.net
JNTP-DataType: Article
Subject: Re: Does the number of nines =?UTF-8?Q?increase=3F?=
References: <tJf9P9dALSN4l2XH5vdqPbXSA7o@jntp> <v6n02q$231iu$3@dont-email.me> <v6n0mu$22nd0$5@dont-email.me>
 <v6n1q7$22opo$9@dont-email.me> <v6n3gg$22ncv$4@dont-email.me> <24df469f-903d-4b10-a296-36cb26113bb4@att.net>
 <PaYSquiOWoAArFrq724peg1nKPk@jntp> <0654078d-76b5-4b52-9e45-3c0a90d5fd47@att.net> <zP3ZN4so3W9aNXqAcM8e8QcUwUY@jntp>
 <a7b04d9a-7872-4652-a4ef-f6ccd7a3ea52@att.net>
Newsgroups: sci.math
JNTP-HashClient: OuytweUYcagmMc7Ins_XQvCOrFY
JNTP-ThreadID: 0JbXgoRqYUfKvvWhEBWZVJgnda4
JNTP-Uri: http://news2.nemoweb.net/?DataID=QmbtUtCrAoIUDH9TBoFvb7pvf84@jntp
User-Agent: Nemo/0.999a
JNTP-OriginServer: news2.nemoweb.net
Date: Sun, 14 Jul 24 13:16:05 +0000
Organization: Nemoweb
JNTP-Browser: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/126.0.0.0 Safari/537.36
Injection-Info: news2.nemoweb.net; posting-host="82b75c1d0a83e677ff646b52485f72f8b23749df"; logging-data="2024-07-14T13:16:05Z/8947677"; posting-account="217@news2.nemoweb.net"; mail-complaints-to="julien.arlandis@gmail.com"
JNTP-ProtocolVersion: 0.21.1
JNTP-Server: PhpNemoServer/0.94.5
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-JNTP-JsonNewsGateway: 0.96
From: WM <wolfgang.mueckenheim@tha.de>
Bytes: 2420
Lines: 30

Le 13/07/2024 à 23:55, Jim Burns a écrit :
> On 7/13/2024 11:43 AM, WM wrote:
>> Le 12/07/2024 à 22:23, Jim Burns a écrit :
>>> On 7/12/2024 1:04 PM, WM wrote:
> 
>>>> says a person who believes that
>>>> by exchanging two elements
>>>> one of them can be lost.
>>>
>>> I have never claimed ℵ₀ = 2
>>
>> You have claimed that
>> by exchanging X and O an O can disappear,
> 
> Yes.

That disqualifies you from any serious discussion.

>> in fact 
>> infinitely many can disappear by pure exchange.
> 
> Yes.

Laughable. Are you aware that nobody followed you?

> What we also which  understand and you (WM) don't is that
> ℕ₁⁺ᴮᵒᵇ and ℕ₁×ℕ₁ aren't finiteⁿᵒᵗᐧᵂᴹ sets, 

Logic remains valid for all correct mathematics, finite and infinite.

Regards, WM