Deutsch English Français Italiano |
<dnbv4j954t8p1ht0j6ne82hjrcrbghqlgv@4ax.com> View for Bookmarking (what is this?) Look up another Usenet article |
Path: ...!news.mixmin.net!news2.arglkargh.de!news.karotte.org!news.szaf.org!nntp-feed.chiark.greenend.org.uk!ewrotcd!news.eyrie.org!beagle.ediacara.org!.POSTED.beagle.ediacara.org!not-for-mail From: Martin Harran <martinharran@gmail.com> Newsgroups: talk.origins Subject: Re: George Coyne and Richard Dawkins Date: Thu, 23 May 2024 22:05:39 +0100 Organization: Newshosting.com - Highest quality at a great price! www.newshosting.com Lines: 47 Sender: to%beagle.ediacara.org Approved: moderator@beagle.ediacara.org Message-ID: <dnbv4j954t8p1ht0j6ne82hjrcrbghqlgv@4ax.com> References: <86v8375w3b.fsf@example.com> <rrso4j1p2nsv1a3462p2hgl3enkr4i2unm@4ax.com> <868r03mflw.fsf@example.com> <ppmp4jd81vnqkel231vlqnmigmqimmun3n@4ax.com> <864jaqn6s3.fsf@example.com> <h1SdnZDKxfww19D7nZ2dnZfqn_idnZ2d@giganews.com> <868r02cjd2.fsf@example.com> <dcucnQVYsJZFmdP7nZ2dnZfqlJ-dnZ2d@giganews.com> <20240522165107.6fca02a7edbb3bea632740c7@127.0.0.1> <630u4j1avvkp1b73bs8kfvfqrjkssaglb5@4ax.com> <OpudnZ51RZ5uxNL7nZ2dnZfqlJ8AAAAA@giganews.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Injection-Info: beagle.ediacara.org; posting-host="beagle.ediacara.org:3.132.105.89"; logging-data="93823"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@beagle.ediacara.org" User-Agent: ForteAgent/8.00.32.1272 To: talk-origins@moderators.isc.org Return-Path: <news-admin@admin.omicronmedia.com> X-Original-To: talk-origins@ediacara.org Delivered-To: talk-origins@ediacara.org id E9504229870; Thu, 23 May 2024 17:05:24 -0400 (EDT) by beagle.ediacara.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B79A122986E for <talk-origins@ediacara.org>; Thu, 23 May 2024 17:05:22 -0400 (EDT) id 1960A7D128; Thu, 23 May 2024 21:05:42 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: talk-origins@moderators.isc.org by mod-relay.zaccari.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id F2C4B7D121 for <talk-origins@moderators.isc.org>; Thu, 23 May 2024 21:05:41 +0000 (UTC) by nntpmail01.ams1.omicronmedia.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3980A2019D8 for <talk-origins@moderators.isc.org>; Thu, 23 May 2024 21:05:41 +0000 (UTC) id 0193D1720206; Thu, 23 May 2024 21:05:40 +0000 (UTC) X-Path: fx15.ams1.POSTED!not-for-mail X-Original-Complaints-To: abuse(at)newshosting.com X-NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 23 May 2024 21:05:39 UTC Bytes: 4768 On Thu, 23 May 2024 08:00:03 -0700, John Harshman <john.harshman@gmail.com> wrote: >On 5/23/24 1:38 AM, Martin Harran wrote: >> On Wed, 22 May 2024 16:51:07 +0100, "Kerr-Mudd, John" >> <admin@127.0.0.1> wrote: >> >>> On Wed, 22 May 2024 07:44:39 -0700 >>> John Harshman <john.harshman@gmail.com> wrote: >>> >>> [time for a snip] >>>>> He got himself into that pickle by saying God is not an intervening >>>>> engineer. The alternative is that every living thing has a soul. >>>> >>>> There are other alternatives. For example, the soul could be an emergent >>>> property of the body, particularly of the brain. If he gave us brains >>>> (mentioned above), souls could have come along with that, and perhaps >>>> even gradually. Maybe chimps have near-but-not-quite-souls. >>>> >>> >>> How about: God emerges from sapient (or could I say superstitious?) beings? >> >> "Though sensitive soul in man and brute agree generically, yet they >> differ specifically. As the animal, man, differs specifically from >> other animals by being rational, so the sentient soul of a man differs >> specifically from the sentient soul of a brute by being also >> intelligent. The soul therefore of a brute has sentient attributes >> only, and consequently neither its being nor its activity rises above >> the order of the body: hence it must be generated with the generation >> of the body, and perish with its destruction. But the sentient soul in >> man, over and above its sentient nature, has intellectual power: hence >> the very substance of this soul must be raised above the bodily order >> both in being and in activity; and therefore it is neither generated >> by the generation of the body, nor perishes by its destruction." >> >> Thomas Aquinas, Of God and His Creatures, chapter LXXXVIII, LXXXIX > >To the extent that Aquinas can be understood here, he seems to be going >back to the first option, that God is an intervening engineer, creating >and installing a soul into each human. I can't claim any particular insight into Aquinas, I was just aware from discussion elsewhere that he considered all animals to have a soul of some type. What struck me in the above was where he said "As the animal, man, differs specifically from other animals by being rational …" He doesn't sound like somebody who would have been perturbed at the idea of humans evolving from other species.