Path: ...!weretis.net!feeder9.news.weretis.net!news.nk.ca!rocksolid2!i2pn2.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Richard Damon Newsgroups: sci.math Subject: Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary) Date: Thu, 2 Jan 2025 14:47:38 -0500 Organization: i2pn2 (i2pn.org) Message-ID: References: <069069bf23698c157ddfd9b62b9b2f632b484c40@i2pn2.org> <2d3620a6e2a8a57d9db7a33c9d476fe03cac455b@i2pn2.org> <75921cc1f17cdb691969a99e666f237cd09c0b09@i2pn2.org> <25729298b142c60d5b245231984119d42d4ac089@i2pn2.org> <09ef32dfb3944d321e15e1383820166a2082d5cb@i2pn2.org> <6d7fb8f4346eb09ea7ccdff45e8ff3d0c4a45ab0@i2pn2.org> <85c0a8a2a0f1429c0b3c7acc69e659d174710347@i2pn2.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Injection-Date: Thu, 2 Jan 2025 19:47:38 -0000 (UTC) Injection-Info: i2pn2.org; logging-data="1700256"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@i2pn2.org"; posting-account="diqKR1lalukngNWEqoq9/uFtbkm5U+w3w6FQ0yesrXg"; User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 4.0.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Language: en-US Bytes: 3138 Lines: 40 On 1/2/25 12:28 PM, WM wrote: > On 02.01.2025 14:26, Richard Damon wrote: >> On 1/2/25 6:52 AM, WM wrote: >>> On 01.01.2025 15:47, FromTheRafters wrote: >>>> WM wrote : >>> >>>>> The collection of definable natural numbers (FISONs) is closed >>>>> under multiplication >>>> >>>> How can that be? >>> >>> Potential infinity. > >> Whicn means it never ends, and doesn't have a highest member. > > So it is. Nevertheless no FISON is more than 1 % of ℵ₀. And there are an INFINITE set of FISONs, so you can't union them ALL with a one by one process in a finite logic. CHECKMATE. > Hard to understand for people without extraodinary mathematical > capabilities. > No, YOU can't understand that your logic just blew itself up to smithereens on the inconsistancies of finite logic on infinite sets. > Hint first try to understand 50 %, then 10 %, then 1 %, then 1 ppm, then > 1 ppb, then 1/10^10^10^10^10. And then go on. Then you understand the > properties of FISONs. And ALL finite fractional ratios of Aleph_0, are Aleph_0, and thus infinite so you arguement just fails. > > Regards, WM > You are just proving your utter stupidity.