Path: ...!2.eu.feeder.erje.net!feeder.erje.net!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!individual.net!not-for-mail From: Arno Welzel Newsgroups: comp.mobile.android Subject: Re: Why do so many people confuse Google's Firebase (cloud API) with Google Services Google Firebase App Indexing (search results)? Date: Sun, 23 Jun 2024 16:41:10 +0200 Lines: 85 Message-ID: References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: individual.net uXeyZ0DOnELxL24XKZz8GgvWldcD4BVGRebRU2LdWzqLFd1U5b Cancel-Lock: sha1:zTow3xS0laHe0HKNhRm29ksyEzk= sha256:thvez6n+1VBXdFNqTAiPcJMYGbrc/szL8jD8hUJHbGI= Content-Language: de-DE In-Reply-To: Bytes: 4113 Andrew, 2024-06-23 09:18: > Arno Welzel wrote on Sun, 23 Jun 2024 02:58:16 +0200 : > >> Andrew, 2024-06-22 20:48: >> >>> Why do so many people (including myself, at first) confuse Google's >>> Firebase (cloud API) with Google Services Google Firebase App Indexing >>> (search results)? >>> >>> Firebase (cloud related): >>> >>> "Firebase and Google Cloud share three products: Cloud Firestore, >>> Cloud Functions, and Cloud Storage. These are the same products >>> that exist in Google Cloud, simply exposed for client-side >>> developers via Firebase. You can access the same data from the >>> server SDKs (Google Cloud) and the client SDKs (Firebase), >>> so your frontend and backend teams can work in concert." >> >> Firebase App Indexing was part of Firebase and not a separate product: >> > > The question I asked is a very difficult question to answer. No, it's quite simple: "Firebase" is a mostly cloud based platform with a number of services provided by Google: messaging, storage, usage analytics, indexing and so on. "Firebase App Indexing" is one single feature of that and not a separate product. [...] >> If you don't trust Google, don't use their products! > > That's terrible advice. For a whole bunch of reasons. Don't get me wrong > though, as I know what you're saying (i.e., you're saying Google is evil). > > However, one reason it's terrible advice is we're just trying to UNDERSTAND > what's going on; and to say don't use any product if you want to understand > how it works, is just about the worst advice possible, IMHO. > > However, another more pragmatic reason that's terrible advice is there are > only two practical choices for cellphones: Android & iOS. No, there are also "dumb" phones out there which don't use any "smart" operating system at all or are at least very limited: And there is the Librem 5 which does not use Android or iOS either but its own "PureOS": And since Android is open source, there are also Android versions like e/OS/ or devices by Murena *without* any Google services at all: And LineageOS can also be used without any Google services at all: And using F-Droid you can get many apps as well. Of course if you *must* use a smartphone as a second authentication factor for your bank account or similar applications, you may just get a cheap device which is only used for that purpose and nothing else. > Given we're not an iOS group (for different reasons), we are all using > Android. Now, you could be talking about rooting & using AOSP... but... See above. > Given my Samsung Galaxy A32-5G baseband is unrootable, I'm forced to use > some version of Android so I'm stuck using Google products de jure. No, you can just buy a different device. -- Arno Welzel https://arnowelzel.de