Path: ...!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!individual.net!not-for-mail From: Thomas Heger Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity,sci.physics,sci.math Subject: Re: The failure of the unified field theory means general relativity fails. Date: Sun, 7 Jul 2024 10:19:22 +0200 Lines: 48 Message-ID: References: <693b1f71c994c268d60983eb81fc6aaa@www.novabbs.com> <667bc249$0$11713$426a74cc@news.free.fr> <6686f816$0$3283$426a74cc@news.free.fr> <2b08dc378555ea532b8bb69fb2f3b360@www.novabbs.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Trace: individual.net ZjAh9KB7S1LDkzAua8io1w20N0ZbZQixeukt7z2xOPnwbO8lbg Cancel-Lock: sha1:weMRuObt+mhj9Q8YAFdOXYO24iE= sha256:5zG7HlazxNR9mkssjxfvXkgROKv5vuCfkO4K4rVQZpQ= User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Content-Language: de-DE In-Reply-To: Bytes: 2766 Am Samstag000006, 06.07.2024 um 13:41 schrieb Richard Hachel: > Le 06/07/2024 à 07:04, Thomas Heger a écrit : >> Am Samstag000006, 06.07.2024 um 02:15 schrieb bertietaylor: >>> Conservation of charge is the only conservation law. >>> Rest is bollocks. >> >> >> I would say: no, charge is not 'observer invariant'. >> >> Actually  I try to promote a concept, where the electron and a photon >> are the same thing, where the electron is circeling around in an atom, >> while the photon flies away in a streight line. >> >> The 'photoelectric effect' is then easy: >> >> in this concept a photon is kind of helical srew (wave packet). >> >> If that is stopped (e.g. by a metall screen) then the helical screw is >> 'knocked flat' and circles around a point, hence is an electron. >> >> A electron is actually not a real separate entity, but a certain >> aspect of a standing 'rotation wave'. >> >> The outer edge is called 'electron' and the inner turning point 'proton'. >> >> If the electron 'rolls away', it will become a photon. >> >> And if the photon gets stopped, it will become an electron. >> >> Therefore: charge is not conserved. >> >> >> TH > > C'est intéressant. > > Sauf que j'ai toujours dit que "the photon doesn't exist". > Sorry, but I understand only very little French ( a little but, but not much). So, please, say it again, but in English. (german would be ok, too, but I guess you don't speak that). TH