Path: ...!feeds.phibee-telecom.net!2.eu.feeder.erje.net!feeder.erje.net!feeds.news.ox.ac.uk!news.ox.ac.uk!nntp-feed.chiark.greenend.org.uk!ewrotcd!news.eyrie.org!beagle.ediacara.org!.POSTED.beagle.ediacara.org!not-for-mail
From: jillery <69jpil69@gmail.com>
Newsgroups: talk.origins
Subject: Re: What is YOUR view?
Date: Tue, 02 Apr 2024 07:52:14 -0400
Organization: What are you looking for?
Lines: 17
Sender: to%beagle.ediacara.org
Approved: moderator@beagle.ediacara.org
Message-ID: <m9sn0jte057o26n718eula48msq8scjuiq@4ax.com>
References: <l6su06Fs2kkU2@mid.individual.net> <uuc5v6$1tk35$1@dont-email.me> <46bl0jpmo2vg6ijotck05lpdt4rm2krmi9@4ax.com> <uuej7r$2i3jd$3@dont-email.me> <6v2n0jl3ra84dupasek4fk3epbbp1pbrmu@4ax.com> <uugmv6$359nh$1@dont-email.me>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Injection-Info: beagle.ediacara.org; posting-host="beagle.ediacara.org:3.132.105.89";
	logging-data="97560"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@beagle.ediacara.org"
User-Agent: ForteAgent/8.00.32.1272
To: talk-origins@moderators.isc.org
Cancel-Lock: sha1:9VBKg9cFVhbcmH+5om4Ft7c1yAI=
Return-Path: <news@eternal-september.org>
X-Original-To: talk-origins@ediacara.org
Delivered-To: talk-origins@ediacara.org
	id B237E22976C; Tue,  2 Apr 2024 07:52:19 -0400 (EDT)
	by beagle.ediacara.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 865EA229758
	for <talk-origins@ediacara.org>; Tue,  2 Apr 2024 07:52:17 -0400 (EDT)
	id 2C0345DD0C; Tue,  2 Apr 2024 11:52:19 +0000 (UTC)
Delivered-To: talk-origins@moderators.isc.org
	by mod-relay-1.kamens.us (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0CE525DCC9
	for <talk-origins@moderators.isc.org>; Tue,  2 Apr 2024 11:52:18 +0000 (UTC)
	id 835BDDC01CA; Tue,  2 Apr 2024 13:52:15 +0200 (CEST)
X-Injection-Date: Tue, 02 Apr 2024 11:52:15 +0200 (CEST)
X-Auth-Sender: U2FsdGVkX192+L3omFMbQ7u2Q+bS6bonxyQlac+sZOA=
Bytes: 2472

On Tue, 2 Apr 2024 06:34:14 -0400, JTEM <jtem01@gmail.com> posted yet
another self-parody:

>  jillery wrote:
>
>> Specify exactly how Medieval Warm Period is especially relevant.
>
>No. You are a goddamn jackass troll.
>
>You pretended that something was unprecedented, yet admit that
>you haven't the faintest clue as to WHAT the precedents are.
>
>Now double down and pretend you didn't do either of these things,
>like a good mental case.

--
To know less than we don't know is the nature of most knowledge