Path: ...!weretis.net!feeder6.news.weretis.net!feeder8.news.weretis.net!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Geo Newsgroups: fr.misc.actualite.covid19 Subject: Re: =?ISO-8859-15?Q?ARN,_antibiotiques_:_les_r=E9v=E9lations_excl?= =?ISO-8859-15?Q?usives_du_professeur_Raoult_!?= Date: Wed, 17 Jan 2024 19:20:24 +0100 Organization: A noiseless patient Spider Lines: 22 Message-ID: References: <65a58b97$0$2566$426a74cc@news.free.fr> <65a59a57$0$16352$426a74cc@news.free.fr> <65a673ff$0$7524$426a74cc@news.free.fr> <65a676ad$0$7524$426a74cc@news.free.fr> <7lA7UGyoFgAfKZHcL7WTqBZqHNQ@jntp> <65a678e7$0$2999$426a74cc@news.free.fr> <65a6e649$0$8252$426a74cc@news.free.fr> <65a818f2$0$29758$426a74cc@news.free.fr> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="90557faa236d34d35c06de28f0ece35c"; logging-data="2268919"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX19fUE2Jd4s1RpKQrlPynlbt" Cancel-Lock: sha1:h1gfh4sxxqhcR8H1nK7/x5m7itU= X-Newsreader: MesNews/1.08.06.00 X-Face: 7Npr]YtaiRF.daNb$#]VN~Ph+$EZ@Vqao9W^*/2QgAYbsUU<]PPY}sIP@pph?LD;`I?poD7 =nir>(V(e{!5$QoRr;:&-"u3~RY><) Bytes: 2902 De Le très baratineur Luciole135, le 17/01/2024 : > Le 17/01/2024 à 9:38, bruno a écrit : >> We searched Pubmed, from 1st December 2019, to 15th March 2021, using the >> keywords "coronavirus", "severe acute respiratory syndrome 2 coronavirus", >> "SARS-CoV-2", "novel coronavirus", "nCoV", "2019-nCoV" and "COVID-19" and >> "cohort". From Pubmed, we selected studies according to the following >> inclusion criteria: multicentre study, study size ≥ 500 patients to avoid >> centre effect, study reporting the treatments used in COVID-19 and the >> number of patients treated with these drugs. Studies including only >> patients receiving HCQ, receiving HCQ from August 2020 onwards, and >> patients already treated with HCQ for autoimmune conditions were excluded, >> as well as studies from countries for which mortality data were lacking. > > Qu'est-ce que vous ne comprenez pas dans le fait que cette projection, > puisqu'il s'agit d'une projection et non pas d'une étude observationnelle ait > sélectionné 44 études sur 7748, ce qui la rend non significative. > Sachant de plus qu'une projection ne peut pas par essence signifier quoi que > ce soit. Un échantillon de moins de 30 personnes ne vous choque pas quand c'est Raoult qui en tire des conclusions universelles.