Path: ...!weretis.net!feeder8.news.weretis.net!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Catrike Ryder Newsgroups: rec.bicycles.tech Subject: Re: Some bicycle paths... Date: Fri, 19 Jul 2024 16:54:01 -0400 Organization: A noiseless patient Spider Lines: 83 Message-ID: References: <53jj9jtab5fqsg547bae3noikuqcrmgp1s@4ax.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Injection-Date: Fri, 19 Jul 2024 22:54:05 +0200 (CEST) Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="5358640b37493c7602c53540d8baf618"; logging-data="3316458"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX19ndvVRG27/jAEEvNU5QSQABWmwDWZE3Gg=" User-Agent: ForteAgent/8.00.32.1272 Cancel-Lock: sha1:k1xK339Dwp/P5SCQTUYYLZJPoBw= Bytes: 4999 On Fri, 19 Jul 2024 16:31:14 -0400, Frank Krygowski wrote: >On 7/19/2024 4:15 PM, AMuzi wrote: >> On 7/19/2024 3:12 PM, Zen Cycle wrote: >>> On 7/19/2024 11:35 AM, AMuzi wrote: >>>> On 7/19/2024 10:14 AM, Frank Krygowski wrote: >>>>> On 7/19/2024 8:55 AM, AMuzi wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> Politically disfavored citizens do hard time for 'trespass'*: >>>>>> https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/justice-department/-right-thing-jan-6-rioter-says-sentenced-25-years-prison-rcna104934 >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> "... she believed she had the right to climb over broken glass to >>>>> enter the Capitol ..." >>>>> >>>>> As someone said here recently, "Play stupid games, win stupid prizes." >>>>> >>>> >>>> She did not break the glass. >>>> >>>> Capitol Security held the doors open for citizens exercising their >>>> 1st Amendment rights to assemble and petition for redress. >>> >>> I see, is that why the "peaceful petitioners" decided to smash the >>> windows out of the doors? I'm struggling to see why the "vandalism" >>> was necessary if the capital police politely held the doors open for >>> those "peaceful petitioners", >>> >>> https://media.cnn.com/api/v1/images/stellar/prod/211228144847-09-jan-6-capitol-unf-restricted.jpg?q=w_1576,c_fill >>> >>> https://www.usatoday.com/gcdn/presto/2021/01/06/USAT/f5253d0f-3d53-416d-881b-7d1a34c52fff-GettyImages-1294942197.jpg?width=660&height=440&fit=crop&format=pjpg&auto=webp >>> >>> https://www.usatoday.com/gcdn/presto/2021/12/28/USAT/b54ed3a4-53fa-4112-b68d-fe0adb474c94-AP21006809982539.jpg?width=1320&height=880&fit=crop&format=pjpg&auto=webp >>> >>> I guess this image is those very polite officers holding the door open >>> for peaceful petitioners >>> >>> https://media.npr.org/assets/img/2022/01/05/ap21133832328925_slide-6b6b89838b8fb9e340b428c8030bedf4ea3e845b.jpg?s=2000&c=85&f=webp >>> >>> let alone why those polite police felt the need to draw their weapons >>> and fire them. >>> >>> https://media.cnn.com/api/v1/images/stellar/prod/211228143850-18-jan-6-capitol-unf.jpg?q=w_1576,c_fill >>> >>> Sorry andrew, but the narrative that it was a peaceful protest is >>> complete unmitigated bullshit (read: a fucking lie). >>> >>> What's more disappointing is that you're intelligent enough to >>> understand what really happened, unlike a certain other deluded >>> kool-aide drinker in this forum. >>> >>> It was an attempted insurrection. There was no "peaceful redress" >>> intended. The rioters stormed the capital with the intent of >>> preventing the peaceful transition of power through violence and >>> intimidation. Those who were jailed for it didn't get nearly what the >>> deserved. It was treason, nothing less. >>> >>>> No one's defending felony assault, but most of the 6 January >>>> prisoners did no such thing. >>> >>> Actually, you're doing just that, trying to claim it was a peaceful >>> protest to address a grievance. It was nothing of the kind, and your >>> kowtowing to the magatard mob is very specifically condoning felonious >>> assault. >> >> Perhaps I was not clear. >> >> No one's defending felony assault, but most of the 6 >> January prisoners did no such thing. >> >> Does that help? > >No. Even if they were not assaulting security guards or smashing >windows, anyone partipating in that crowd and entering where they were >clearly forbidden to enter was taking part in a riot. And their >objective was clear: To prevent the peaceful transfer of power that was >intended by the constitution, and properly done every prior time without >exception. It didn't help that they were they preferred the "wrong" party. https://nypost.com/2021/06/20/hundreds-of-nyc-rioters-looters-have-charges-dropped/