Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Joel Newsgroups: comp.os.linux.advocacy Subject: Re: Linux 6.11 Date: Sun, 29 Sep 2024 20:40:55 -0400 Organization: A noiseless patient Spider Lines: 52 Message-ID: References: <66f7c11c$0$3677$426a74cc@news.free.fr> <66f90cff$0$3244$426a74cc@news.free.fr> <66f94e84$0$3690$426a74cc@news.free.fr> <66f99a8a$0$1784$426a34cc@news.free.fr> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Injection-Date: Mon, 30 Sep 2024 02:40:56 +0200 (CEST) Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="9b2a9aa34fd41ade1212c8f600c60eb4"; logging-data="2047186"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1/IE7pDAGab/LddG6dgwy8ixuWGJMsyTIo=" User-Agent: ForteAgent/8.00.32.1272 Cancel-Lock: sha1:QmsCgoSGi48/c9lnkv9DS+ggbkM= OS: openSUSE Leap 15.6, with Wine 9.0 for WinAPI Bytes: 3293 CrudeSausage wrote: >On 2024-09-29 2:20 p.m., Stéphane CARPENTIER wrote: >> Le 29-09-2024, Joel a écrit : >>> Stéphane CARPENTIER wrote: >>> >>>>> Yet, you posted this: >>>>> >>>>> https://i.imgur.com/fUXvwdR.png >>>> >>>> As unlike your claim of using your brain about the subject, you refuse >>>> to used your brain to understand what's explained to you, I'll answer >>>> that just once. >>>> >>>> For a start, I don't know what he posted and I don't care. When you sent >>>> this message, did you want to be read and understood? If no, good job >>>> keep going like this. If yes, you loose. I don't know what's behind your >>>> link and I don't care. So if you want me to know it, you put text in >>>> your message, not a screenshot of text. >>> >>> Fail. Heh. >> >> Yep, I'm not that surprised. You can't understand. You can't respect >> others, you can only request them to respect you. But it doesn't work >> that way. The respect goes either both ways or doesn't go. >> >>> 2024 Usenet ... >> >> Yes, your brain isn't improving when time is passing. In anyone it's >> true, but it's truer for you with all the drugs and alcohol you take. > >I'm just waiting for him to call you homophobic for disagreeing with >him. That's how the feeble-minded usually work. It's not homophobic, no. It's incorrect, the screenshot snippet communicates what text cannot. -- Joel W. Crump Amendment XIV Section 1. [...] No state shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States; nor shall any state deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws. Dobbs rewrites this, it is invalid precedent. States are liable for denying needed abortions, e.g. TX.