Deutsch   English   Français   Italiano  
<rzWdncjV56dze_j7nZ2dnZfqnPSdnZ2d@giganews.com>

View for Bookmarking (what is this?)
Look up another Usenet article

Path: ...!Xl.tags.giganews.com!local-2.nntp.ord.giganews.com!news.giganews.com.POSTED!not-for-mail
NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 09 Jun 2024 17:31:25 +0000
Subject: Re: Doctor Who S01E06 Rogue
Newsgroups: rec.arts.drwho
References: <v40ds6$2ea1l$1@dont-email.me> <xn0omtmb66xquh5006@post.eweka.nl>
 <v43r4q$3bvkk$1@dont-email.me> <xn0omv5538ixao0000@post.eweka.nl>
 <v444qu$gut$5@gallifrey.nk.ca> <xn0omva8o8pvitu001@post.eweka.nl>
 <v44opc$3la6f$2@dont-email.me>
From: % <pursent100@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 9 Jun 2024 10:31:25 -0700
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101
 Firefox/91.0 SeaMonkey/2.53.18.2
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <v44opc$3la6f$2@dont-email.me>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Antivirus: AVG (VPS 240609-4, 2024-6-9), Outbound message
X-Antivirus-Status: Clean
Message-ID: <rzWdncjV56dze_j7nZ2dnZfqnPSdnZ2d@giganews.com>
Lines: 60
X-Usenet-Provider: http://www.giganews.com
X-Trace: sv3-OWe5HRccUt345F4d7pNDy0GyjM30A7vEPhpLScVIIDm9bCF4wknzuxThkBTtom2SHjpqMHnNPv3vwZW!PKFmjbSHM/cawp6YlzFroMcm1b2oOIui+oNgWxpdU23E6hqX1X5XPbGk0PYu/kHrxEmWGpNW465I
X-Complaints-To: abuse@giganews.com
X-DMCA-Notifications: http://www.giganews.com/info/dmca.html
X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers
X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint properly
X-Postfilter: 1.3.40
Bytes: 4095

The True Doctor wrote:
> On 09/06/2024 15:28, Blueshirt wrote:
>> The Doctor wrote:
>>
>>> In article <xn0omv5538ixao0000@post.eweka.nl>,
>>> Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
>>>> solar penguin wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> So... Jo Martin and Richard E Grant are the Doctor's
>>>>>> predecessors then they are?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Nice one. I'm sure the Fugitive Doctor and the Shalka
>>>>>> Doctor will approve that you feel their legacies have been
>>>>>> insulted...
>>>>>>
>>>>>> It's unlike you, but well done. You are always spot on
>>>>>> with your observations.
>>>>>
>>>>> Don’t forget Aggie’s face-blindness. He probably just plain
>>>>> didn’t recognise Jo Martin and Richard E Grant.
>>>>
>>>> Well, I was surprised he didn't at least mention them in his
>>>> 'review' of the episode... after all, he had twenty
>>>> paragraphs to do it!
>>>
>>> IYIO.
>>
>> I reckon he was too busy with his political agenda to even
>> notice! After all, he didn't notice the same actress was
>> appearing in cameos in every episode until it was pointed out to
>> him... and then said "who cares?" even though it was clearly an
>> important arc! <whoosh> ... Plus, he missed the main message of
>> "Dot & Bubble" until that was pointed out to him too <whoosh>
>> ... So Agamemnon clearly sees what HE wants to see and misses
>> what is really going on.
> 
> You've proven once again that you are a brainwashed fool.
> 
> I already mentioned the perversion of the characters of Gatwa's 
> predecessors at the start and end of my review. Learn the meaning of the 
> word predecessors. My use of it indicates that I didn't consider either 
> some or all of them to be legitimate incarnations of the Doctor. The 
> names of the imposters had no relevance to the story and have no merit 
> whatsoever so I refused to name them.
> 
> The use of a cameo as a repeated meme instead of rational exposition and 
> story and plot progression and development is a example of shit writing 
> and the work of a retard who doesn't even possess the writing ability of 
> a 6 year old child and doesn't have a clue how to write a story arc. It 
> is not work mentioning or discussing since so far it has told us 
> absolutely nothing. Shit writing doesn't deserve credit or recognition.
> 
> Why do you think barely over 2 million people are watching this shit?, 
> and I suspect that they probably only have the TV on in the background 
> to heat up the room while they're doing the housework or playing video 
> games on their mobile devices.
> 
they only get one channel