Path: ...!Xl.tags.giganews.com!local-2.nntp.ord.giganews.com!news.giganews.com.POSTED!not-for-mail NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 23 May 2024 15:21:35 +0000 Subject: Re: What evfect will 5G have on 4G? From: danmin@danminart-dot-com.no-spam.invalid (Danart) Newsgroups: comp.mobile.android Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit User-Agent: newsSync 665838804 References: Message-ID: Date: Thu, 23 May 2024 15:21:35 +0000 Lines: 68 X-Usenet-Provider: http://www.giganews.com X-Trace: sv3-fLQvgHqHgk/F+KYHHynrMjADIwiz/36cPZzGwS7a5hNclt9KElGbgu1DAjK6wv1JozllPp/h+A/RdwP!bDMcgq4plPuL+zTyohpt3N38a5ZPPrpnqddEjMdfUoO7HAKL5k7U3iCvVTlv6jTdKan5MNVyigEb!fg== X-Complaints-To: abuse@giganews.com X-DMCA-Notifications: http://www.giganews.com/info/dmca.html X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint properly X-Postfilter: 1.3.40 Bytes: 4064 X-Original-Lines: 1 > micky wrote: > Since 5G cells are smaller than prior cells, 4G and earlier, when 5G is > well-established, won't they still have to keep 4G to reach into the > unpopulated woods, mountains, and deserts as far as cellular signals go > now? > > Surely they don't plan to build even more 5G cell towers in unpopoulated > areas where it hasn't been worth it to build a smallar number of 4G > towers. Lets be realistic. 4G -> 5G is literally akin to 32-bit -> 64-bit computing. That 32-bit power is barely a grain of sand from the greater whole. Like if you took a cracker and hit it to make a tiny piece fall off. That is how much power is 64-bit. The towers are smaller because the technology to make them smaller has become cheaper. So these smaller towers in fact could be more powerful and have multiple functions outside the regular towers. The problem with this is the fact that most people do not use the bandwidth at all. Which means phone companies ( or cable ) have all this extra space that is not being used at all. This is why they could offer you services with all these extras because it is not costing them anything to run. However a danger with 5G outside the radiation awareness. Because radiation = signal. Is the lack of privacy. Right now from the days of the "Star Wars" ( Regan Era Satellite photos ) and FCC triangulating control over the air-waves. Is privacy. Take Princess Latifa. With a just one phone call they were able to zero in on the probably position of the boat, and take her back captive. The same with smart cars with cameras, that talks to guidance systems. Imagine your on the run and your car stops and locks the doors on you. Next thing you know your surrounded by police officers. Then again your going to compare yourself to an dating-scammer or young-mother and say "How could this happen to me, I am a coward I depend on others" ? Not think anything of it. But the flat fact remains, things do happen. Your device should not ask to "report images" let alone dictate if "rape" is occurring in your vehicle. This is a world being engulf into fear street. It is the same argument with carbine-technologies. If people would STFU about them. nobody would care. I am more aware then ever and probably would purchase a couple just because of that. However disarming people is more or less a direct threat duet to marketing ( wrongly influencing ). However by talking about it, we have tweens ( 11-12 year olds ) arming themselves. That being said creates a greater problem. If anything is wrong it is the fact that with 5G towers we could give everybody extra fast 4G speeds and not limit everybody. Honestly building towers in the middle of nowhere is acceptable. Even if it is 4G towers but the cost of the 5G towers is just as good. Using a combine conglomerate of companies to construct and share the tower would work to every-bodies advantage This is a response to the post seen at: http://www.jlaforums.com/viewtopic.php?p=665827038#665827038