Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!nntp-feed.chiark.greenend.org.uk!ewrotcd!news.killfile.org!news.eyrie.org!beagle.ediacara.org!.POSTED.beagle.ediacara.org!not-for-mail
From: Robert Carnegie <rja.carnegie@gmail.com>
Newsgroups: talk.origins
Subject: Re: Peter Nyikos dies 18 Feb, Google kills Usenet 22 Feb.
 Coincidence?
Date: Sun, 10 Mar 2024 13:24:37 +0000
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 11
Sender: to%beagle.ediacara.org
Approved: moderator@beagle.ediacara.org
Message-ID: <uskcal$2vr6b$2@dont-email.me>
References: <6276c971-c5ae-4b08-bfa4-d5f525a77251n@googlegroups.com>
 <f2ODN.94845$Iswd.11647@fx05.iad> <usdgd6$19p6k$1@dont-email.me>
 <86cys5hchr.fsf@example.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Injection-Info: beagle.ediacara.org; posting-host="beagle.ediacara.org:3.132.105.89";
	logging-data="64284"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@beagle.ediacara.org"
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
To: talk-origins@moderators.isc.org
Cancel-Lock: sha1:EGu90LCl1+5FyFXux5UHVHKeGfM=
Return-Path: <news@eternal-september.org>
X-Original-To: talk-origins@ediacara.org
Delivered-To: talk-origins@ediacara.org
	id DC5F222976C; Sun, 10 Mar 2024 09:21:22 -0400 (EDT)
	by beagle.ediacara.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id ACADE229758
	for <talk-origins@ediacara.org>; Sun, 10 Mar 2024 09:21:20 -0400 (EDT)
          by moderators.individual.net (Exim 4.97)
          for talk-origins@moderators.isc.org with esmtps (TLS1.3)
          tls TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384
          (envelope-from <news@eternal-september.org>)
          id 1rjJAX-00000000BW3-1f13; Sun, 10 Mar 2024 14:24:49 +0100
	id 8E078DC01CA; Sun, 10 Mar 2024 14:24:38 +0100 (CET)
X-Auth-Sender: U2FsdGVkX19hPuez89YGHeZxmDyGKTMQv6K5LCoOMvLcSZLwAFKr5Q==
Content-Language: en-GB
In-Reply-To: <86cys5hchr.fsf@example.com>
Bytes: 2228

On 07/03/2024 23:02, Richmond wrote:
> Robert Carnegie <rja.carnegie@gmail.com> writes:
> 
>> I would say, let's get back to what we
>> are in talk.origins for.
> 
> What is that?

It is what I described in the sentence
that I typed after the word "for".