Path: ...!weretis.net!feeder6.news.weretis.net!usenet.blueworldhosting.com!diablo1.usenet.blueworldhosting.com!nnrp.usenet.blueworldhosting.com!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Andrew Newsgroups: comp.mobile.android Subject: Re: Samsung account Date: Thu, 14 Mar 2024 20:36:39 -0000 (UTC) Organization: BWH Usenet Archive (https://usenet.blueworldhosting.com) Message-ID: References: <86il1qmd9v.fsf@example.com> <86y1allws2.fsf@example.com> <86ttl9luim.fsf@example.com> Injection-Date: Thu, 14 Mar 2024 20:36:39 -0000 (UTC) Injection-Info: nnrp.usenet.blueworldhosting.com; logging-data="78529"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@blueworldhosting.com" User-Agent: Xnews/2009.05.01 Cancel-Lock: sha1:FueOI47lZZbeP276nTZ5/6cmaec= sha256:muuwSX4V7IDh6hRen4+uyROQHLnpTcssywSonq6DwI4= sha1:Qtt6BJSpGJ6TNCEbDFJAkmgLYB8= sha256:RtkC9YM6bEEHiO1yujJ1OwPoh+RoRzTVpa0htMD+ubk= Bytes: 2626 Lines: 29 Frank Slootweg wrote on 14 Mar 2024 18:27:48 GMT : > You dishonestly, 'conveniently' snip, without comment, you lose. Now you're just trolling, Frank. You, of all people, Frank, know RFC1855 since you ran a server yourself, that snipping is proper & good netiquette is to quote sparingly. *You quote only that which you're responding to.* HINT: There is no rule, which you seem to think exists, that says you have to quote and respond to the ENTIRE message, Frank.' DOUBLEHINT: I ignored at first that AJL's argument required him to treat Doctor records EXACTLY the same as Wi-Fi apps. TRIPLEHINT: When AJL objected, I responded DIRECTLY to his objections. QUADRUPLEHINT: "quote only relevant parts" "Content of a follow-up post should exceed quoted content." "quote only what is necessary (delete the rest)" "quote just a few key lines from their post so that others wont have to go back and figure out which post you˘re referring to."