Path: ...!2.eu.feeder.erje.net!feeder.erje.net!feeds.news.ox.ac.uk!news.ox.ac.uk!nntp-feed.chiark.greenend.org.uk!ewrotcd!news.eyrie.org!beagle.ediacara.org!.POSTED.beagle.ediacara.org!not-for-mail
From: Ernest Major <{$to$}@meden.demon.co.uk>
Newsgroups: talk.origins
Subject: Re: IS A NEW THEORY OF EVOLUTION NEEDED?
Date: Thu, 28 Mar 2024 17:55:45 +0000
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 37
Sender: to%beagle.ediacara.org
Approved: moderator@beagle.ediacara.org
Message-ID: <uu4av2$3nmc4$1@dont-email.me>
References: <R2EMN.130835$GX69.74962@fx46.iad>
 <9ce9c6464050d3a6c6887b2d4075bbe9@www.novabbs.com>
 <weqcnSwox-XZ0Zn7nZ2dnZfqlJ-dnZ2d@giganews.com>
 <6e795dbd46e15b8731f943dae6b9416e@www.novabbs.com>
 <uC2dnZOg3-XfIpn7nZ2dnZfqlJ-dnZ2d@giganews.com>
 <b4875c400dc041b28ecabc20150b7553@www.novabbs.com>
 <cpWdndNh9Mddfpn7nZ2dnZfqlJydnZ2d@giganews.com>
Reply-To: {$to$}@meden.demon.co.uk
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Injection-Info: beagle.ediacara.org; posting-host="beagle.ediacara.org:3.132.105.89";
	logging-data="62179"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@beagle.ediacara.org"
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
To: talk-origins@moderators.isc.org
Cancel-Lock: sha1:wKEgJ1NpkYShhd7cW6n+b/HVfAQ=
Return-Path: <news@eternal-september.org>
X-Original-To: talk-origins@ediacara.org
Delivered-To: talk-origins@ediacara.org
	id 47DFA22976C; Thu, 28 Mar 2024 13:52:04 -0400 (EDT)
	by beagle.ediacara.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 29A1A229758
	for <talk-origins@ediacara.org>; Thu, 28 Mar 2024 13:52:02 -0400 (EDT)
	id 9065E7D121; Thu, 28 Mar 2024 17:55:49 +0000 (UTC)
Delivered-To: talk-origins@moderators.isc.org
	by mod-relay.zaccari.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 722227D009
	for <talk-origins@moderators.isc.org>; Thu, 28 Mar 2024 17:55:49 +0000 (UTC)
	id B2A89DC01A9; Thu, 28 Mar 2024 18:55:46 +0100 (CET)
X-Injection-Date: Thu, 28 Mar 2024 17:55:46 +0100 (CET)
X-Auth-Sender: U2FsdGVkX1+oVGmIXp0jrKOj5sw448Czh2T99vxQXbFYJhVMoDHg37wIiiheYIQMpkNQuxyR8IPlgn7xGMsmgA==
Content-Language: en-GB
In-Reply-To: <cpWdndNh9Mddfpn7nZ2dnZfqlJydnZ2d@giganews.com>
Bytes: 4153

On 28/03/2024 03:28, John Harshman wrote:
>> Going back to the real issue though, I'm not sure it's quite what they 
>> mean
>> with niche construction - at least the way I understand them - because 
>> there is no feedback loop from the effect that the bear has on its 
>> environment and subsequent selection pressures. IIRC the example we 
>> got in school were beavers: they are adapted for semi-aquatic life, 
>> AND create more
>> semi-aquatic environments through their building activity which then 
>> again acts
>> on the beaver and increases the pressure on those less well adapted 
>> etc. Or humans. -NS is different in an environment with hospitals than 
>> one without
>>
> I had viewed the term as less restrictive, such that any alteration of 
> behavior in turn altering the selective environment experienced by the 
> organism would count. Darwin leaves open the question of whether change 
> in phenotype or of behavior comes first, but he also suggests mutual 
> feedback between the two. My notion was that it's not the physical 
> environment that counts but the environment as experienced by the 
> organism. Thus a change of food source could count. That would certainly 
> increase the impact of niche construction on evolution and greatly 
> increase the number of examples, which would otherwise be fairly few.

Evolution has a number of feedback loops - between species (arms races), 
between the two sexes of a species (sexual selection), between organisms 
and the environment (niche construction), ... It'd be nice to 
operationalise our understanding of these processes, but I doubt that 
rises to a new theory of evolution.

25 years ago chaos was a hot topic, and Kauffman's research program had 
hopes of bringing self-organisation into the centre of evolutionary 
theory. That, if successful, would have, I think, been a bigger change.

-- 
alias Ernest Major