Path: ...!news.mixmin.net!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: FPP Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv Subject: Re: Inconvenient lefties Date: Mon, 8 Apr 2024 10:35:51 -0400 Organization: Ph'nglui Mglw'nafh Cthulhu R'lyeh Wgah'nagl Fhtagn. Lines: 49 Message-ID: References: <17c37b6c29057425$4757$3037545$10d55a65@news.newsdemon.com> <25Ccnb-dnerIwo37nZ2dnZfqn_SdnZ2d@giganews.com> <17c3845f233a098e$3282$2820980$c4d58e68@news.newsdemon.com> <0B2dnfnk4IawGI37nZ2dnZfqn_qdnZ2d@giganews.com> <17c3b829d977a4bb$361$1351842$40d50a60@news.newsdemon.com> <17c3e0882b0394ca$5560$3037545$10d55a65@news.newsdemon.com> Reply-To: fredp1571@gmail.com MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Injection-Date: Mon, 08 Apr 2024 14:35:52 +0200 (CEST) Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="26c008e836d7fbd465f599f2dd499d40"; logging-data="3732172"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1/UcQ4fQ730lpf3L2Rovo+z" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.14; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.10.0 Cancel-Lock: sha1:B+Xr6oWElQFuAst0qDXSKn+0SOo= Content-Language: en-US In-Reply-To: Bytes: 3579 On 4/6/24 11:21 PM, BTR1701 wrote: > In article <17c3e0882b0394ca$5560$3037545$10d55a65@news.newsdemon.com>, > moviePig wrote: > >> On 4/6/2024 2:41 PM, BTR1701 wrote: >>> In article <17c3b829d977a4bb$361$1351842$40d50a60@news.newsdemon.com>, >>> moviePig wrote: >>> >>>> On 4/5/2024 7:11 PM, BTR1701 wrote: >>>>> On Apr 5, 2024 at 3:57:07 PM PDT, "moviePig" wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> On 4/5/2024 4:30 PM, BTR1701 wrote: >>>>>>> moviePig wrote: >>> >>>>>>>> What *opinion* -- of anything anywhere -- can't be contradicted? Fyi, >>>>>>>> *that* would be a violation of 'free speech'... >>>>>>> >>>>>>> No one's muzzling or prohibiting you from making contradictory >>>>>>> statements regarding the SCOTUS ruling. However, your right to free >>>>>>> speech doesn't immunize you from being wrong or bar others from pointing >>>>>>> out your wrongness. >>>>>> >>>>>> ...where "wrongness" means "of differing opinion". >>>>> >>>>> You can have an opinion that SCOTUS decided wrongly and wish it had made a >>>>> different ruling but you can't have an opinion that the law is other than >>>>> it is. >>>> >>>> The 'law' is what SCOTUS has opinions about. I can have *my* opinion >>>> about either or both. Therein, the only "wrong" would be a misquoting. >>> >>> No, the law is what it is and it's not what you claim. You can have your >>> own opinions but you can't have your own facts. >> >> No? The law *isn't* text that SCOTUS has opinions about? ...as I may? > > No, SCOTUS opinions become the law. > Corrupt and illegitimate courts make corrupt and illegitimate laws. -- "Thou shalt not make a machine in the likeness of a man’s mind." - OC Bible 25B.G. https://www.dropbox.com/s/ek8kap93bmk0q5w/D%20U%20N%20E%20Part%20II.jpg?dl=0 Gracie, age 6. https://www.dropbox.com/s/0es3xolxka455iw/BetterThingsToDo.jpg?dl=0