Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: The Last Doctor Newsgroups: rec.arts.drwho Subject: Re: [OT] The dumb and the guilty (Was Re: How many ....) Date: Thu, 11 Apr 2024 15:02:07 -0000 (UTC) Organization: A noiseless patient Spider Lines: 80 Message-ID: References: <199e94ddd32456be8b7d600a5058347b@dizum.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Injection-Date: Thu, 11 Apr 2024 17:02:07 +0200 (CEST) Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="91f0efe10fb5b206e391af095bbc5846"; logging-data="1846845"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1+uUy8yNLIqUmdK8pAoFJ6Y" User-Agent: NewsTap/5.5 (iPhone/iPod Touch) Cancel-Lock: sha1:fpac9pKYhUGgzG9yYrzQ+JIknKM= sha1:PuBR7dInMYjMgzEveQ4rbfFAS7s= Bytes: 3940 solar penguin wrote: > > The liar lied: > >> In article , >> solar penguin wrote: >>> >>> The idiot insisted: >>> >>>> In article , >>>> The Last Doctor wrote: >>>>> The Doctor wrote: >>>>>> In article , >>>>>> The Last Doctor wrote: >>>>>>> The Doctor wrote: >>>>>>>> In article , >>>>>>>> solar penguin wrote: >>>>>>>>> The Last Doctor wrote: >>>>>>>>>> Daniel65 wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> The Doctor wrote on 10/04/2024 12:32 am: >>>>>>>>>>>> In article , >>>>>>>>>>>> Daniel65 wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> No, asswipe, that text DOESN'T contain the >>>>>>>>>>>>> word "Easter", asswipe, so THAT doesn't answer >>>>>>>>>>>>> Solar Penguin's request, asswipe!! >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Crush eh? >>>>>>>>>>>> >>> >>> ^ The idiot used the word ‘crush’ first. >>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> WHAT?? >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Dave is saying he has an enduring crush on SP and >>>>>>>>>> can’t let them go away, and so by continually responding >>>>>>>>>> with drivel continues to seek the attention from SP >>>>>>>>>> that he craves. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> I really, really hope you’re wrong! >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> SP the optimist. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Oh my dear Penguin! I had thought that my comment was >>>>>>> as tongue-in-cheek as the rest of the post. >>>>>>> But it seems he really does have a crush on you! >>>>>> >>>>>> You are a sick one MM! >>>>> >>>>> You’re the one who told SP they were being an optimist to >>>>> hope I was wrong! >>>>> >>>> >>>> You were the one who mentioned crush!! >>>> >>> >>> Liar! That was you! Look, it’s there in the quoted text above. >>> >> >> That was MM! Read again SP!! > > Liar! It’s there in the quoted text for all to see! > It’s true Dave, it was you. It’s not the world’s fault that your entire response to a query as to why you continually failed to answer questions was “crush, eh?” With so little to go on, what else is one to infer but that you have attributed your perpetual failure to answer questions but to carry on the conversation regardless, to your “crush”? It’s what YOU said. And since your respondent was SP, logic dictates that they are the subject of your “crush”. Use more words if you want to convey more meaning. -- “The timelines and … canon … are rupturing” - the Doctor