Path: ...!news.nobody.at!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Alan Newsgroups: misc.phone.mobile.iphone,comp.mobile.android Subject: Re: DOJ is correct that Apple iPhone is far less secure than Android when RCS messaging is involved Date: Mon, 15 Apr 2024 22:23:43 -0700 Organization: A noiseless patient Spider Lines: 126 Message-ID: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Injection-Date: Tue, 16 Apr 2024 07:23:44 +0200 (CEST) Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="3d63ab03d01648e998b5c6cc765dea84"; logging-data="832106"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX18fdW/Dh0BmEtN2DXDNFbr0jXAusZzqDEo=" User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Cancel-Lock: sha1:EaYl1fLHinZGgQDrHzy4V8pG9Fs= Content-Language: en-CA In-Reply-To: Bytes: 5942 On 2024-04-15 22:10, Anonymous wrote: > Alan wrote: >> On 2024-04-14 20:06, Anonymous wrote: >>> Chris wrote: >>>> Anonymous wrote: >>>>> Chris wrote: >>>>>> Anonymous wrote: >>>>>>> Chris wrote: >>>>>>>> Anonymous wrote: >>>>>>>>> Chris wrote: >>>>>>>>>> Anonymous wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> Chris wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>> Anonymous wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>> Java Jive wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 04/04/2024 01:58, Hank Rogers wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> So is trump. They are much alike and have never done >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> anything wrong. Ever. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Neither has ever committed a crime or screwed a customer >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> or business partner. >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> That is provably untrue, in that Trump has already lost >>>>>>>>>>>>>> two civil cases, >>>>>>>>>>>>>> wherein one of which a jury found him to be a rapist  - >>>>>>>>>>>>>> in most civilised >>>>>>>>>>>>>> people's view, that is both committing a crime and >>>>>>>>>>>>>> screwing someone. >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Losing a civil case is not the same as a criminal conviction. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> The claim was the he "never done anything wrong". Losing a >>>>>>>>>>>> civil case is a >>>>>>>>>>>> clear case of doing something wrong. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> No it's not. Anyone can sue anyone for anything. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> And? If the court finds against you you've legally done >>>>>>>>>> something wrong. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Not morally. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Are you saying that Trump has never done anything morally wrong? >>>>>>>> You've >>>>>>>> completely lost any sense of reality. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> At the very least he cheated on two of his wives. He sexually >>>>>>>> assaulted one >>>>>>>> woman (probably more) and he defrauded several banks and the IRS. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> If he legitimately "knife to the throat" raped women, >>>>>> >>>>>> What the fuck does that mean? >>>>>> >>>>>>> then why wasn't >>>>>>> he criminally prosecuted? >>>>>> >>>>>> Like you said yourself the US system doesn't provide justice, >>>>>> especially >>>>>> against rich, powerful men. Sexual assault hasn't been treated >>>>>> well by the >>>>>> CJS for a long time. >>>>> >>>>> Well, you probably think Jacqueline Coakley was telling the truth. >>>>> LOL! >>>>> >>>>> Forget accusations, most rape _convictions_ are false. >>>> >>>> Spoken like a true misogynist. >>> >>> Go read what happened to Harvey Weinstein. >> >> What exactly—in your humble opinion—"happened" to Harvey Weinstein? > > Why should some slut be allowed to go to the authorities after YEARS > AND YEARS and cry "rape"? Why should he be allowed to get away with it even if it's been years? > >>>> Are there any aspects of the law you trust? From here it sounds like >>>> you'd >>>> prefer the wild west. >>>> >>>>>>>>> There are countless laws that literally invent crimes and >>>>>>>>> proscribe >>>>>>>>> punishments when there is no concrete harm being done to anyone or >>>>>>>>> anything. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Countless, really? Examples. >>>>>> >>>>>> Notable you didn't answer this. >>>>> >>>>> All laws that punish mere possession of firearms by peaceable men, >>>>> for one, >>>>> if you really want to get into that debate. >>>> >>>> Why do "peaceable men" need to have a gun? In modern society there's no >>>> need for anyone to be carrying guns. It's just boys pretending to be >>>> men. >>> >>> Because bad and evil men exist. This isn't changed by modern society. >>> >>>> When everyone is carrying a gun >>> >>> But not everyone carries a gun. >> >> The simple fact is: >> >> >> >> Deal with it. >> > > Do you think that someone is more dead after having been shot with a > gun? > > And why the focus on the "developed world"? Because those countries are similar to the US in terms of wealth, social development, etc. > Mexico has fierce gun laws > and a much higher murder rate. And there is a lot more poverty in Mexico.