Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: FPP <fredp1571@gmail.com>
Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv
Subject: Re: BIDEN: "Trump Won't Denounce Political Violence!"
Date: Wed, 17 Apr 2024 08:44:15 -0400
Organization: Ph'nglui Mglw'nafh Cthulhu R'lyeh Wgah'nagl Fhtagn.
Lines: 85
Message-ID: <uvog6v$1jt55$2@dont-email.me>
References: <R7SdnYbK0udVhZP7nZ2dnZfqn_qdnZ2d@giganews.com>
 <uvgtgb$3n4e9$1@dont-email.me>
 <atropos-6EF449.11434814042024@news.giganews.com>
 <uviopq$6e9c$1@dont-email.me> <zPGcnYse4sDgq4D7nZ2dnZfqnPgAAAAA@giganews.com>
 <uvlpfs$u7hv$5@dont-email.me>
 <atropos-050713.12112716042024@news.giganews.com>
Reply-To: fredp1571@gmail.com
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Date: Wed, 17 Apr 2024 14:44:16 +0200 (CEST)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="2f4dcf440bda917fc6282bcb1c6f6d96";
	logging-data="1701029"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1/TB2imrLg3cv9kJ3ctMeI5"
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.14; rv:78.0)
 Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.10.0
Cancel-Lock: sha1:402vXJtbHTDMJudx7Sh1Z32tbPQ=
In-Reply-To: <atropos-050713.12112716042024@news.giganews.com>
Content-Language: en-US
Bytes: 4903

On 4/16/24 3:11 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
> In article <uvlpfs$u7hv$5@dont-email.me>, FPP <fredp1571@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> 
>> On 4/15/24 10:15 AM, BTR1701 wrote:
>>> On Apr 15, 2024 at 1:34:00 AM PDT, "FPP" <fredp1571@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> On 4/14/24 2:43 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
>>>>> In article <uvgtgb$3n4e9$1@dont-email.me>,
>>>>> "Adam H. Kerman" <ahk@chinet.com> wrote:
>>>>>    
>>>>>> BTR1701 <atropos@mac.com> wrote:
>>>>>>> On Apr 9, 2024 at 6:15:20 PM PDT, FPP <fredp1571@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>> On 4/9/24 12:46 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
>>>>>>>>> On Apr 9, 2024 at 6:53:43 AM PDT, FPP <fredp1571@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> On 4/6/24 2:37 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>    . . .
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> And you still haven't explained why Biden hasn't denounced any of
>>>>>>>>>>> them, since he's decreed that denouncing political violence is the
>>>>>>>>>>> duty of every president.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> [Fred Phelps citing headline]
> 
>>>>>>>>>>> Fact check: Joe Biden has condemned Antifa, violent protests
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Wait, I thought Antifa didn't exist? Now you're claiming it does
>>>>>>>>> and that Biden has condemned them?
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Wow. Baby steps, I guess.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Or do they only exist to the extent you can win on Usenet today?
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> It exists as a concept, but not as an organization.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> LOL! So it was a concept that was trying to burn down the federal
>>>>>>> courthouse every night in Portland during the 2020 Summer of Love,
>>>>>>> was it?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I'm so confused about Fred Phelps' position here. These large-scale
>>>>>> protests that included violence, arson, and vandalism were organized
>>>>>> through Twitter by people forwarding tweets. An "organization" is a
>>>>>> body that organizes something. A protest was organized by those tweeting.
>>>>>    
>>>>> Of course Effa is full of it here. Even his fellow leftists recognize
>>>>> Antifa as a thing, not just some ephemeral 'concept'.
>>>>>    
>>>>> He acts like since they don't issue membership cards they're not a
>>>>> group.
>>>>>    
>>>>>> fact that they worked in concert is what made them an organization,
>>>>>> even without being organized as a corporation, partnership, or
>>>>>> unincorporated society with charters and bylaws and other organic
>>>>>> documents. Working together by passing the word along is what made
>>>>>> them an organization.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> It exists as a means of organizing among those doing the organizing.
>>>>>> This is actual, not conceptual. Working together toward a common
>>>>>> purpose is all that's necessary to be an organization.
>>>>
>>>> Two dumbfucks don't make a right.
>>>>
>>>>    From House.gov (who have slightly more credibility than two ignorant
>>>> fucks bitching and whining on Usenet.
>>>
>>> Hahahahahahaha! Congress has credibility? Since when?
>>
>> 1787.  You know... that thing that you took an oath to protect and defend.
> 
> Congress didn't exist then. That's the Constitution you're talking
> about, which is what I took an oath to defend. No one takes an oath to
> defend Congress, jackass.
> 

Constitution written in 1787. Ratified 1788.  Met 1789.
Any questions?

-- 
"Thou shalt not make a machine in the likeness of a man’s mind." - OC 
Bible  25B.G.
https://www.dropbox.com/s/ek8kap93bmk0q5w/D%20U%20N%20E%20Part%20II.jpg?dl=0

Gracie, age 6.
https://www.dropbox.com/s/0es3xolxka455iw/BetterThingsToDo.jpg?dl=0