Path: ...!weretis.net!feeder6.news.weretis.net!feeder8.news.weretis.net!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Daniel70 Newsgroups: rec.arts.drwho Subject: Re: Google Gemini reviews Doctor Who - The Rescue Date: Fri, 19 Apr 2024 20:12:06 +1000 Organization: A noiseless patient Spider Lines: 24 Message-ID: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Injection-Date: Fri, 19 Apr 2024 12:12:08 +0200 (CEST) Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="c27180e834a2ca3e1bf757c32e138c1a"; logging-data="3101818"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1/8nqmT+7VqniTqA6CbVoM7xgitVu5YoeE=" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101 SeaMonkey/2.53.18.2 Cancel-Lock: sha1:cXRXh5anaAO0hO1cN281PBfJkNY= In-Reply-To: Bytes: 2103 The Doctor wrote on 19/4/24 7:00 am: > In article , > Blueshirt wrote: >> The Doctor wrote: >> >>> "The Rescue" is the third serial of Doctor Who's second season, >>> originally broadcast in 1965. Here's a breakdown to help you >>> decide if you'd like to watch it: >> >> I watched it on VHS, (it was released with "The Romans" in the >> 90's) and it was okay. Entertaining enough for a two-part story >> that was basically produced just to introduce a new companion, >> but "The Rescue" lacked substance beyond that. >> >> I did think the Target novelisation was more enjoyable though. > > And no AI reviews got it correct!! > So WHY, OH, WHY do YOU, asswipe, keep posting their DRIBBLE, asswipe!! Oh!! Of course, the All Important Precious Post Count ..... Any Garbage will do as long as it's a Post!! -- Daniel