Deutsch English Français Italiano |
<v009q9$3ks14$1@dont-email.me> View for Bookmarking (what is this?) Look up another Usenet article |
Path: ...!weretis.net!feeder8.news.weretis.net!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Daniel70 <daniel47@nomail.afraid.org> Newsgroups: rec.arts.drwho Subject: Re: [OT] The dumb and the guilty (Was Re: How many ....) Date: Sat, 20 Apr 2024 21:44:11 +1000 Organization: A noiseless patient Spider Lines: 39 Message-ID: <v009q9$3ks14$1@dont-email.me> References: <199e94ddd32456be8b7d600a5058347b@dizum.com> <xn0okrbssaf0qei000@post.eweka.nl> <uvttue$2f38$11@gallifrey.nk.ca> <xn0okrm90ata3to001@post.eweka.nl> <uvupsl$m3g$2@gallifrey.nk.ca> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Injection-Date: Sat, 20 Apr 2024 13:44:10 +0200 (CEST) Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="1f3866216da3d4f54a40be508cde07ef"; logging-data="3829796"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX18xCpBxOuUu0FBrbMVsKTiALv/wgs0qe6I=" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101 SeaMonkey/2.53.18.2 Cancel-Lock: sha1:GTrt9/fxl+7FDLHZFLdPoJPbJ4c= In-Reply-To: <uvupsl$m3g$2@gallifrey.nk.ca> Bytes: 2697 The Doctor wrote on 20/4/24 8:06 am: > In article <xn0okrm90ata3to001@post.eweka.nl>, > Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote: >> The Doctor wrote: >> >>> In article <xn0okrbssaf0qei000@post.eweka.nl>, >>> Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote: >>>> The Doctor wrote: >>>>> >>>>> Might have to check your favoutire archive to check your >>>>> assertion. >>>> >>>> My Usenet service provider has retention of rec.arts.drwho >>>> back to 1st July 2003, that's 747,979 messages (as of >>>> today)... IF I had the time and patience to go through them >>>> all I am pretty sure that I could find thousands of messages >>>> where you were wrong and a way way smaller percentage of >>>> messages where you was right! >>>> >>>> In fact I doubt if the messages where you was right would >>>> total 1% of those 747,979 messages! But of course, that is >>>> only a wild guess. >>> >>> Does it have a searchable feature? >> >> Of course, but why would I search through 21 years of messages >> to RADW? I'm not a glutton for punishment... or a masochist. >> >> RADW is a newsgroup where the discussions generally go round and >> round in circles, so anything that I've missed through the years >> will surely be round again at some stage! > > Searchable is what rocks!! > Hey, asswipe, YOU have YOUR own Server. How long is the retention on THAT, asswipe?? Maybe YOU, asswipe, could do a search of its files, asswipe!! -- Daniel