Path: ...!weretis.net!feeder6.news.weretis.net!feeder8.news.weretis.net!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Cameo <cameo@unreal.invalid>
Newsgroups: misc.phone.mobile.iphone,comp.mobile.android
Subject: Re: Apple loses top phonemaker spot to Samsung
Date: Mon, 22 Apr 2024 01:34:26 -0000 (UTC)
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 33
Message-ID: <v04er2$jeq1$1@dont-email.me>
References: <uvk67u$1gs1v$1@paganini.bofh.team>
 <1OicndcpH_uzV4D7nZ2dnZfqnPudnZ2d@supernews.com>
 <v03bgq$3an52$1@paganini.bofh.team>
 <v03h29$dc20$2@dont-email.me>
 <v03l8m$ecq9$1@dont-email.me>
 <v03v7q$gfd3$1@dont-email.me>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-2
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Date: Mon, 22 Apr 2024 03:34:27 +0200 (CEST)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="ad0c2783aaf6ff77b8f880c66a4ffc5d";
	logging-data="637761"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX19BwwLn/hFelLAG4XiRtYpv+hHFVhkEeEs="
User-Agent: NewsTap/5.5 (iPhone/iPod Touch)
Cancel-Lock: sha1:s20JRG6t+u5oY/IoHTmB3dR7Bu8=
	sha1:LRVN5Mx8DaPTG6kYGRmJIieIVPo=
Bytes: 2338

Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> wrote:
> On 2024-04-21 11:17, Cameo wrote:
>> Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> wrote:
>>> On 2024-04-21 08:31, Jerry Friedman wrote:
>>>> On 4/15/24 6:45 PM, Tyrone wrote:
>>>>> Apple and Samsung routinely trade 1st and 2nd place
>>>> 
>>>> Bullshit. People like you are as stupid as shit. You know nothing.
>>>> Yet you think you know everything. You masturbate to Apple advertisements.
>>>> 
>>>> When you're making your Apple bullshit up, at least make it believable.
>>>> Samsung has been #1 every quarter (but 1) for more than a decade.
>>>> 
>>> 
>>> Then the OP was incorrect...
>>> 
>> 
>> The OP was just asking questions.
>> 
> 
> The OP posted:
> 
> "Apple loses top phonemaker spot to Samsung"
> 
> It is impossible for both the OP to be correct about that and for the 
> previous poster to be correct that, "Samsung has been #1 every quarter 
> (but 1) for more than a decade"...
> 
> ...UNLESS that one quarter was the immediately previous quarter.
> 

Pardon me, I thought I answered in the UWB thread.
Should have my mouth shut.