Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Klaus Vestergaard Kragelund Newsgroups: sci.electronics.design Subject: Re: CCFL transformer Date: Thu, 25 Apr 2024 10:06:07 +0200 Organization: A noiseless patient Spider Lines: 37 Message-ID: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Injection-Date: Thu, 25 Apr 2024 10:06:08 +0200 (CEST) Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="4b5c888e51d2a6be223cc6358a08a070"; logging-data="3044795"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX192sLnVhaQcmot67FcmePL9Fu874pRLF8Y=" User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Cancel-Lock: sha1:LHRSeSgtQEsywzTT81KhgKWaUz0= In-Reply-To: Content-Language: en-US Bytes: 2081 On 24-04-2024 15:37, legg wrote: > On Wed, 24 Apr 2024 01:57:36 +0200, Klaus Vestergaard Kragelund > wrote: > >> Hi >> >> I need a low distributed capacitance winding transformer, for a HV >> stepup function (3.5kV) >> >> I am zeroing in on similar concept as CCFL transformers with >> sectionalized bobbin. >> >> For example: >> >> https://www.coilcraft.com/en-us/products/transformers/power-transformers/ccfl-transformers/fl/ >> >> Possibly using Triple Insulated Wire to create some distance between the >> individual turns. >> >> Not many sells CCFLs these days. >> >> Guess I will keep it alive.... >> >> Regards >> >> Klaus > > When there are a lot of turns, 3xFEP is not the way to > go. Too bulky. The three layers is basically a trick to > avoid creepage requirements for pri-sec safety. That's > not what you need here. > > Anything off the shelf will be a great time saver. > Yes, probably better to just wind it with distance between the turns