Path: ...!news.nobody.at!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: solar penguin Newsgroups: rec.arts.drwho Subject: Re: From the Archives ..... Date: Thu, 25 Apr 2024 13:27:13 -0000 (UTC) Organization: A noiseless patient Spider Lines: 22 Message-ID: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Injection-Date: Thu, 25 Apr 2024 15:27:13 +0200 (CEST) Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="b47b6786a477f5b2746e8f56431a1c63"; logging-data="3184265"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1+9tqaIOBBVZxKu1G53c5sAbuKBQnnXOC8=" User-Agent: NewsTap/5.5 (iPhone/iPod Touch) Cancel-Lock: sha1:CIx7sYmK+qyJQ/+8yj0GZ7wyAAg= sha1:Ls9q4xOfS3/78T/nnGze5VPfqBA= Bytes: 2265 The unTrue Doctor has no idea about truth: > > To anyone watching the episode who has never watched Doctor Who before, > and doesn't recognize Pertwee let along Hartnell it's made obvious from > the start that when Tom Baker's face is not on the screen then he's > losing to Morbius and the intention of the director and original script > writer is that all the faces the viewer does not recognize are those > generated by Morbius of himself as he appeared in the past and in > disguise, since it's clearly not Tom Baker. > If the faces are Morbius, why is he in Victorian/Edwardian clothes of the sort associated with the Doctor? Why isn’t he in Time Lord robes? You say he’s ‘in disguise’ but that disguise would make him stick out like a sore thumb (maybe even two or three sore thumbs) on Gallifrey. Just who is he supposed to be disguised as, and why? -- solar penguin