Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Ubiquitous <weberm@polaris.net>
Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv
Subject: Re: Gov. Katie Hobbs (D Arizona) vetoes bill allowing police to arrest trespassers falsely claiming to be tenants
Date: Fri, 03 May 2024 04:30:41 -0400
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 52
Message-ID: <v12htn$gtvk$1@dont-email.me>
References: <v0orib$1tvca$1@dont-email.me> <2vl03jltkhjgbatrjvpa09fh5fkvcf3hne@4ax.com> <v0q9qo$2bp77$1@dont-email.me> <v0qqkf$2flp7$1@dont-email.me> <-s2cnbhkjOPmp6z7nZ2dnZfqnPadnZ2d@giganews.com> <v0thkh$36om8$1@dont-email.me> <atropos-EF3206.10123301052024@news.giganews.com>
Injection-Date: Fri, 03 May 2024 13:31:04 +0200 (CEST)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="fd26bddbef562f77462098ecc7b4db92";
	logging-data="554996"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1/u0oJULSvZ3ATAOSoYObNVXDzJ2nBZ7Xc="
Cancel-Lock: sha1:OQmISq6jkvDzmJ3JzKrDcf4bsIs=
X-Newsreader: WinVN 0.99.12N (x86 32bit)
Bytes: 3509

atropos@mac.com wrote:
> FPP <fredp1571@gmail.com> wrote:
>> On 4/30/24 2:37 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
>>> "Dimensional Traveler" <dtravel@sonic.net> wrote:
>>>> On 4/30/2024 1:23 AM, Adam H. Kerman wrote:
>>>>>  The Horny Goat <lcraver@home.ca> wrote:

>>>>>> What the heck do issues of domestic violence have to do with squatters
>>>>>> moving in when the homeowner is away and refusing to vamoose in near
>>>>>> record time when found out?
>>>>>>   
>>>>>> If >I< were Governor I'd work towards instant eviction along with
>>>>>> award of damages as soon as an injuction were obtained and i would
>>>>>> order application for such injunctions get ultra-high priority in
>>>>>> court scheduling. (I'd be satisfied with 2-3 hour turnaround - and
>>>>>> DEFINITELY not 4-6 weeks as I've heard of in some jurisdictions)
>>>>>   
>>>> ROFLMAO. You have no clue how the courts actually work.
>>> 
>>> Courts enforce the law. Change the law and the courts have no choice
>>> but to comply with it.
>
>> Courts don't enforce the law. You're supposed to be a LAWYER, for 
>> fuck's sake. Ask USCourts.gov.
>> 
>>> The federal judiciary operates separately from the executive and 
>>> legislative branches, but often works with them as the Constitution 
>>> requires. Federal laws are passed by Congress and signed by the president. 
>>> The judicial branch decides the constitutionality of federal laws and 
>>> resolves other disputes about federal laws. However, judges depend on our 
>>> government's executive branch to enforce court decisions.
>
>And here Effa uses one of his favorite "change the subject" tactics, 
>hoping no one will notice and he'll score a win on Usenet today.
>
>Everything he cited references the federal courts when the federal 
>courts have nothing to do with state landlord/tenant law. His entire 
>response is an irrelevancy.
>
>Nothing he wrote above changes the fact that if the Arizona legislature 
>changed the law and gave citizens the right to summarily eject squatters, 
>a state court would apply that law to any case coming before it.

The lengths to which FFP will go for an "Internet win".
Sad!

--   
"Rhino, when do I say things I *can't* back up with citations of 
fact? Go ahead... go and find something I stated as fact that you 
don't think I can back up." 
        -- FPP <fredp151@gmail.com>