Path: ...!news.nobody.at!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.c++,comp.lang.c
Subject: Re: Threads across programming languages
Date: Sat, 4 May 2024 12:59:10 -0700
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 14
Message-ID: <v1642e$1cg4b$2@dont-email.me>
References: <GIL-20240429161553@ram.dialup.fu-berlin.de>
 <v0ogum$1rc5n$1@dont-email.me> <v0ovvl$1ur12$4@dont-email.me>
 <v0p06i$1uq6q$5@dont-email.me>
 <v0shti$2vrco$2@raubtier-asyl.eternal-september.org>
 <v0spsh$31ds4$3@dont-email.me>
 <v0stic$325kv$3@raubtier-asyl.eternal-september.org>
 <v0svtn$32o8h$1@dont-email.me>
 <v0t091$32qj6$1@raubtier-asyl.eternal-september.org>
 <v0u90h$3c1r5$4@dont-email.me> <v0v7rf$3lu04$1@dont-email.me>
 <v0v8u3$3m7rm$1@dont-email.me> <v10t0v$20cs$1@dont-email.me>
 <v116q4$4at1$1@dont-email.me> <v119bu$4pfa$1@dont-email.me>
 <v127i4$ej9d$1@dont-email.me> <20240503180533.000017ff@yahoo.com>
 <v12vb0$ju1r$2@raubtier-asyl.eternal-september.org>
 <20240503184754.00006997@yahoo.com>
 <v15kla$199l7$1@raubtier-asyl.eternal-september.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Injection-Date: Sat, 04 May 2024 21:59:11 +0200 (CEST)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="00566bb81b0a3452542610785f934900";
	logging-data="1458315"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1+yobO0iXP/7kvdPldo3DE2InzrEoJWbgI="
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Cancel-Lock: sha1:Cb4aXI4mIB1kwOzAn4nbKGJmJAs=
In-Reply-To: <v15kla$199l7$1@raubtier-asyl.eternal-september.org>
Content-Language: en-US
Bytes: 2272

On 5/4/2024 8:36 AM, Bonita Montero wrote:
> Am 03.05.2024 um 17:47 schrieb Michael S:
> 
>>> I don't think it makes a big difference if Python has a GIL or
>>> not since it is interpreted and extremely slow with that anyway.
> 
>> 64 times faster than slow wouldn't be fast, but could be acceptable.
>> ...
> 
> With a GIL the code doesn't scale.
> 

Giant Interpreter Lock, well that sounds just a little bit better than 
Global Interpreter Lock... ;^o