Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Clive Arthur Newsgroups: sci.electronics.design Subject: Re: Dressing RG6 Date: Wed, 15 May 2024 16:05:00 +0100 Organization: A noiseless patient Spider Lines: 24 Message-ID: References: Reply-To: clive@nowaytoday.co.uk MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Injection-Date: Wed, 15 May 2024 17:05:01 +0200 (CEST) Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="1a1a96da760199d2ac109c7345c4e795"; logging-data="996003"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX19nbc5bODloWm2ZC+M6i++JsuU/ry1Fiow=" User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Cancel-Lock: sha1:mdMjsETL0HPQgJDNlKAQBHAhPHw= In-Reply-To: Content-Language: en-GB Bytes: 1785 On 14/05/2024 17:51, Don Y wrote: > I've several short (a few feet) lengths of RG6 that I > would like to "strongly coerce" into assuming a particular > dressing. > > Securing the cables to a stationary surface isn't practical > without significantly lengthening them and distorting > their "natural" routing. > > But, ISTM that I should be able to slip each cable into > a comparable diameter copper (?) pipe and then use traditional > tools to bend that pipe into the appropriate configuration. > I'd have to observe constraints like minimum bend radius > but are there other issues that I might "discover" down the > road? How about semi-rigid adhesive lined heat shrink tubing? https://www.farnell.com/datasheets/3758112.pdf -- Cheers Clive