Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Don Y <blockedofcourse@foo.invalid>
Newsgroups: sci.electronics.design
Subject: "Safe" cell phone WiFi capabilities?
Date: Thu, 16 May 2024 23:11:47 -0700
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 10
Message-ID: <v26sfc$222ek$1@dont-email.me>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Injection-Date: Fri, 17 May 2024 08:11:57 +0200 (CEST)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="8a8551ece1cb0c10a1b606592a2a5e58";
	logging-data="2165204"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1/lBp4mLReZV7M3jAl6PzNs"
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; Win64; x64; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/102.2.2
Cancel-Lock: sha1:uOwxMjDa1BxvaJmEg4LuRxZ5OwY=
Content-Language: en-US
Bytes: 1309

For "nominal" cell phones (i.e., taking into consideration
that not ever subscriber buys The Latest and Greatest),
what's the "base" WiFi capability one would feel comfortable
assuming?  ac?  ax?

If you extend that to include *all* phones currently in service
(e.g., 4G onwards), where would you put the cutoff?  n?  g?

[US market]