Path: ...!3.eu.feeder.erje.net!feeder.erje.net!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: super70s Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv Subject: Re: Kamala Outright Lies About Women's Basketball Brackets Date: Tue, 4 Jun 2024 02:32:47 -0500 Organization: A noiseless patient Spider Lines: 111 Message-ID: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Injection-Date: Tue, 04 Jun 2024 09:32:49 +0200 (CEST) Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="8ac6b0ff8e4f2749cbac70f51b6b3027"; logging-data="369120"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1/2CCjF4J3XECUe4AgcO/JxRqs2KBtoAwI=" User-Agent: Unison/2.2 Cancel-Lock: sha1:pGkm+kixMoYYrf0mhfq9QaA4OB0= Bytes: 5593 On 2024-06-04 01:26:20 +0000, Adam H. Kerman said: > super70s wrote: >> On 2024-06-03 19:59:19 +0000, Adam H. Kerman said: >> >>> super70s wrote: >>>> On 2024-06-02 13:27:33 +0000, FPP said: >>>> >>>>> On 6/1/24 1:14 PM, super70s wrote: >>>>>> On 2024-05-31 10:21:51 +0000, FPP said: >>>>>> >>>>>>> On 5/30/24 12:05 PM, BTR1701 wrote: >>>>>>>> In article , FPP >>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> On 5/29/24 4:19 PM, BTR1701 wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Kamala Harris claimed that women's basketball wasn't even >> allowed to have >>>>>>>>>> playoff brackets until 2022, when in reality, women's >> basketball has been >>>>>>>>>> using them since 1982, 42 years. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Kamala herself tweeted out exchanges with her husband in 2021 >> where they >>>>>>>>>> talked about who they were choosing in their brackets. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> https://youtu.be/yYjH5g9ogXE?t=409 >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Between Biden's almost weekly made-up stories about his past and Kamala >>>>>>>>>> gaslighting us about women's basketball, what the hell is going >> on in the >>>>>>>>>> White House? >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Now tell the rest of the story, coward. But you won't, so I'll have to >>>>>>>>> do it again. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Mediaite reached out to the Vice President's office for >> clarification and >>>>>>>>>> was told that Harris did, in fact, misspeak and that she meant to >>>> say that >>>>>>>>>> the use of the "March Madness" copyright was only made available to the >>>>>>>>>> women's tournament lin 2022. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Hahahahahahahahahaha! >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> "Misspeak". That's politician code for "lie". >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Feel better now, Bunky? She owned up to her mistake and explained it. >>>>>>>>> Something you or any of your Oathkeeper buddies would have the stones >>>>>>>>> to do. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Just like you refuse to do in the UNRWA thread. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Really. You need to learn how to read. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> You don't seem to mind outright lying and felony convictions, but if >>>>>>> someone owns up to a mistake, you can't abide that. >>>>>> >>>>>> A women's basketball gaffe? This is what you call scraping the bottom >>>>>> of the barrel for some "gotcha" moment. >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Everyone know being wrong about college basketball is the same as rape, >>>>> fraud, election interference, witness tampering, insurrection, stealing >>>>> classified documents, obstruction of justice etc. >>>>> >>>>> It's all equal to our resident Oathkeeper lawyer. >>>> >>>> Yes I'm sure Adam H. Kerman, Esq. would agree. Even if he does need to >>>> buff up on his copyright and trademark case law. >>> >>> Still contributing STOOPID rather than actual discussion, Dear >>> Sockpuppet. >> >> That's the second time you've said that, who am I supposed to be a >> "sockpuppet" of? >> >>> Go for it. Name the aspect of either trademark or copyright law that >>> would prevent the women's sport of intercollegiate athletics from having >>> a system of playoffs created to meet the needs of their sport. >> >> Haven't you thoroughly embarrassed yourself enough with the "it's too >> generic a concept to be trademarked" boner? That's all I was referring >> to. > > I didn't correct the spokesflak use of "trademark" rather than > "copyright"; that was BTR1701. I quoted you exactly, quit blaming him. > You're still ducking the question. Clearly you cannot answer because you > are ignorant as fuck. No pal it's you who's ignorant as fuck because you claimed "college women's basketball['s] playoff structure....[is] too generic a concept to be trademarked" and moviepig gave you a cite that proved you were clearly wrong. Don't get mad at me because you screwed up with some generic claim that was easily disproved. > I still want to know why you believe that women's > college basketball couldn't have "playoff brackets" till they had > permission from the trademark holder. Is that what you still want to know? Well that's not the issue at hand and nothing I ever put forth. Go argue with someone who said that.