Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Phil Hobbs <pcdhSpamMeSenseless@electrooptical.net>
Newsgroups: sci.electronics.design
Subject: Re: AD5791
Date: Tue, 4 Jun 2024 23:12:51 -0000 (UTC)
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 58
Message-ID: <v3o71i$kh5f$1@dont-email.me>
References: <vqcu5j9nu9tf051iu0f1grobcehg1pb0rv@4ax.com>
 <v3nr7c$ibi4$1@dont-email.me>
 <u5vu5j9ku6qe120jjm8jipotletq72b1sm@4ax.com>
 <v3o67e$kcsg$1@dont-email.me>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Date: Wed, 05 Jun 2024 01:12:51 +0200 (CEST)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="d0de4698a6dd44801af72791eed81064";
	logging-data="672943"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX18SHxWfmOXsXF4TGiuhUSpl"
User-Agent: NewsTap/5.5 (iPhone/iPod Touch)
Cancel-Lock: sha1:Jue47MyQNLB64Et5gd7SK/M2/NM=
	sha1:9X3yi/7fiG7HJfykpuXEuKgGp4s=
Bytes: 2883

Phil Hobbs <pcdhSpamMeSenseless@electrooptical.net> wrote:
> john larkin <jl@650pot.com> wrote:
>> On Tue, 4 Jun 2024 21:53:13 +0200, Jeroen Belleman
>> <jeroen@nospam.please> wrote:
>> 
>>> On 6/4/24 19:48, john larkin wrote:
>>>> https://www.analog.com/en/products/ad5791.html
>>>> 
>>>> That's an amazing part. 20 bit DAC with 1 PPM accuracy and 0.05 PPM
>>>> per degree C tempco.
>>>> 
>>>> My main gripe is its 3.4K output impedance, which makes a lot of
>>>> Johnson noise. I suppose I could run a bunch in parallel.
>>>> 
>>> 
>>> But you can power the chip from +/-16V and the LSB can be in
>>> the 25uV ballpark. The Johnson noise of 7.5nV/rtHz doesn't
>>> seem so bad then, does it?
>>> 
>>> Jeroen Belleman
>> 
>> That helps some. +-14v is about the limit on the references. We'd have
>> to divide down to get our +-10v range back, and that would need some
>> crazy stable resistors.
>> 
>> Looks like the other way to get the noise down would be to parallel a
>> number of DACs. Times 8 channels! Ballpark $100 per DAC, which is
>> actually feasible.
>> 
>> It will of course need crazy-low-noise hyper-stable references.
>> 
>> I wonder how ADI tests these parts. I can't buy a 1 PPM accurate DVM.
>> 
>> 
> 
> Its quoted rise time is 1us, corresponding to a 3 dB bandwidth of about 350
> kHz, or 550  kHz noise bandwidth. 
> 
> With 7.5 nV 1-Hz noise, the total RMS noise should be about 5.6 uV, just
> about half a LSB at 10V FS. 
> 
> Not that shabby. 
> 
> Cheers 
> 
> Phil Hobbs 
> 

Never mind. The 1 us is the settling time, so the BW is wider than 350 kHz.


Cheers 

Phil Hobbs 

-- 
Dr Philip C D Hobbs  Principal Consultant  ElectroOptical Innovations LLC /
Hobbs ElectroOptics  Optics, Electro-optics, Photonics, Analog Electronics