Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com>
Newsgroups: sci.math
Subject: Re: how
Date: Fri, 14 Jun 2024 11:30:18 -0700
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 34
Message-ID: <v4i27r$30hok$1@dont-email.me>
References: <qHqKnNhkFFpow5Tl3Eiz12-8JEI@jntp>
 <hZvnfi5EsOcLQp4jywf9ecNmAW8@jntp> <v4cvqt$1qbpc$3@dont-email.me>
 <marAIk0bzCCe6m7qluPLtxzZ0Zw@jntp> <v4d1pc$1qq74$2@dont-email.me>
 <9HunCi0heOernIpLiINDMDau01o@jntp> <v4d2f7$1qq74$5@dont-email.me>
 <v4d2hd$1qq74$6@dont-email.me> <dVNyc7MMp5G7UOSEcqTzh_UWDPI@jntp>
 <v4ff6r$2dbap$3@dont-email.me> <5ISO1HfS0t1DlswIafDbi0VJXhM@jntp>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Date: Fri, 14 Jun 2024 20:30:19 +0200 (CEST)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="8e5f18a20736c78d4fdceb317c66453f";
	logging-data="3163924"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1+Qec2NKN6gDMG3LHWrYnzYFiBVhjtk2fI="
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Cancel-Lock: sha1:bGsxtVCFjCnkdkVePBEvm617Y/Y=
In-Reply-To: <5ISO1HfS0t1DlswIafDbi0VJXhM@jntp>
Content-Language: en-US
Bytes: 2052

On 6/14/2024 1:40 AM, WM wrote:
> Le 13/06/2024 à 20:53, "Chris M. Thomasson" a écrit :
>> On 6/13/2024 3:48 AM, WM wrote:
> 
>>> Fact is: If we assume the existence of ω at the ordinal line, then 
>>> something must exist before, either dark numbers or nothing. There is 
>>> no third alternative. Or can you imagine one?
>>
>> Let be imagine something that was dark:
>>
>> A = 1024^42426969
> 
> Then A^A^A is no longer dark, let alone

So, the following sequence is never dark?
________________
A = 0
A = A + 1 = 1
A = A + 1 = 2
A = A + 1 = 3
.... (on and on) ...
________________

Right?


>> B = A + 1
>>
>> A and B were already in the set of natural numbers, right?
> 
> Of course.

Okay.