Path: ...!3.eu.feeder.erje.net!feeder.erje.net!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Daniel70 <daniel47@nomail.afraid.org>
Newsgroups: rec.arts.drwho,uk.media.tv.sf.drwho
Subject: Re: Dave Yadallee denies reality, bears false witness
Date: Wed, 26 Jun 2024 16:22:20 +1000
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 50
Message-ID: <v5gc2u$20tqq$1@dont-email.me>
References: <xn0on0tk1ebn7yw000@post.eweka.nl> <v5bvsu$vj1q$2@dont-email.me>
 <v5c2an$24da$1@gallifrey.nk.ca> <v5e92h$1hfoo$1@dont-email.me>
 <v5eh07$j7e$3@gallifrey.nk.ca>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Date: Wed, 26 Jun 2024 08:22:23 +0200 (CEST)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="c8cdf0014d9a8e520260b62e3a659cc7";
	logging-data="2127706"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX19hz15WiDPBJOIip6pMlTaX37qk11LfMhY="
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101
 SeaMonkey/2.53.18
Cancel-Lock: sha1:rWDz8s6rc5AOC08o+ApXWhukvmc=
In-Reply-To: <v5eh07$j7e$3@gallifrey.nk.ca>
Bytes: 3374

The Doctor wrote on 25/06/2024 11:33 pm:
> In article <v5e92h$1hfoo$1@dont-email.me>, Daniel70
> <daniel47@nomail.afraid.org> wrote:
>> The Doctor wrote on 25/6/24 1:11 am:
>>> In article <v5bvsu$vj1q$2@dont-email.me>, Daniel70
>>> <daniel47@nomail.afraid.org> wrote:
>>>> The Doctor wrote on 24/6/24 11:09 pm:
>>>>> In article <%XdeO.239896$2RJ6.138143@fx05.ams4>,
>>>>> Hornplayer9599 <Hornplayer9599@aol.com> wrote:
>>>>>> On 6/24/2024 03:16, Daniel70 wrote:
>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> He can claim all he wants.  However, anyone can go
>>>>>>>> back up the thread and read the original post(s) that
>>>>>>>> are not snipped.  He seems to forget about that,
>>>>>>>> unless he's going to claim that people go back and
>>>>>>>> snip/trim every...single...line of 
>>>>>>>> every...single...post in a thread to erase his
>>>>>>>> non-existent answer so nobody can read what he didn't
>>>>>>>> say anyway.
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> That would be correct ..... *IF* the reader were reading
>>>>>>> the posts in a threaded display ..... but guess who
>>>>>>> *DOESN'T* have his display set up in a Threaded display
>>>>>>> format!!
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> He just reads the posts one post after another post ....
>>>>>>> so once the information is snipped from a reply,
>>>>>>> Gobble-de-gook is unable to locate/read it!!
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Yeah, you're right.  I sometimes give Gobble-de-gook too
>>>>>> much credit.
>>>>> 
>>>>> Still tuning the horn in the middle of your face?
>>>> 
>>>> Still got nothing "On Topic" to contribute, Gobble-de-gook!!
>>> 
>>> Still clueless Dannyboy?
>>> 
>> Not at all, Gobble-de-gook. I'm fully aware that YOU,
>> Gobble-de-gook, *HAVE* to respond to *EVERY* post, even if it *IS*
>> with GARBAGE, like the above reply, so that YOU, Gobble-de-gook,
>> can increase YOUR All Important Post Count, Gobble-de-gook!!
> 
> Care to write out a mathematical formula Dannyboy?

How would THAT improve YOUR ability to *NOT* respond to *EVERY* post
made here, Gobble-de-gook ..... even when it doesn't add anything to the
on-going discussion, Gobble-de-gook??
-- 
Daniel