Path: ...!news.mixmin.net!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Python <python@invalid.org>
Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity
Subject: Re: Langevin's paradox again
Date: Wed, 17 Jul 2024 02:14:00 +0200
Organization: CCCP
Lines: 49
Message-ID: <v772c8$1g2hc$3@dont-email.me>
References: <FER4K03RCuXsBiIlfVNSgR0vilQ@jntp>
 <yX3K1wOobcIp1KzCuRuRL0Htcvg@jntp> <v73otr$ptku$1@dont-email.me>
 <cGLopKEv1S9qR2nNCvaF8IqKf-s@jntp> <v75m18$1828i$2@dont-email.me>
 <esHcGgnWa-kSH-yFGrczTDSFLzc@jntp> <v76e49$1cn1q$1@dont-email.me>
 <v76nem$1ebn0$1@dont-email.me> <FFrGxTJqoYn_9dompHy3ad1cKHg@jntp>
 <v770fo$1g2hc$2@dont-email.me> <jgeYvukMyg74yWHaS7WTlqxWXaw@jntp>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Date: Wed, 17 Jul 2024 02:14:01 +0200 (CEST)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="11923cb29fc9016b5182303cf2a03872";
	logging-data="1575468"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX19bkxQMj21/WYfkJANGvuqC"
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Cancel-Lock: sha1:1bAPx2994HHNbuC2SnzfVgxd4vs=
In-Reply-To: <jgeYvukMyg74yWHaS7WTlqxWXaw@jntp>
Content-Language: en-US
Bytes: 3997

Le 17/07/2024 à 02:11, M.D. Richard "Hachel" Lengrand a écrit :
> Le 17/07/2024 à 01:41, Python a écrit :
>> Le 17/07/2024 à 00:44, Richard Hachel a écrit :
> 
>> You contradict yourself and the principle of Relativity on your
>> claims about accelerated/inertial twins. I'm not the only one
>> who pointed that to you. You are insanely egotist and stupid,
>> Richard. You should not be allowed to practice medicine in France
>> as you currently are.
> 
> But no my dear Jean-Pierre,
> I am not contradicting myself, and indeed, after 40 years of reflection 
> on the subject, I have achieved total mastery of RR on all these 
> essential principles.
> You know, my darling, everything did not fall from the sky, it took me 
> thousands of hours of reflection to obtain fairly good scientific bases, 
> and I thought I would never be able to to complete my personal mission: 
> to understand at least two or three important things about the universe 
> in its scientific, theological, philosophical whole.
> It is also not excluded that I disappeared, nothing remains.
> On the other hand, I have never stopped telling you, to you who is an 
> ugly brat who doesn't want to understand anything, it is true that the 
> RR contradicts itself on many things.
> I have already given formal proof of this.
> One of the best, incontestable proofs is the Langevin in apparent mode 
> which is perfectly absurd if we take the contraction of lengths at face 
> value, but the resolution of the problem offends human navel-gazing.
> Human navel-gazing is such that if you reveal a disturbing truth to him, 
> he will take, if he can, millennia to challenge it.
> The truth (be careful, my darling) is that there is no contraction of 
> distances by change of frame of reference, but on the contrary an 
> expansion of distances.
> This is what Poincaré says in his transformation, and this explains all 
> the misunderstandings that have existed for 120 years.
> You noticed that the quantity sqrt(1-Vo²/c²) of the transformation
> of Poincaré-Lorentz is found in the denominator in 
> x'=(x-Vo.To)/sqrt(1-Vo²/c²)?
> General dilatation, my dear Watson. Lorentz factor obliges.
> Which also explains the 36 al that Stella sees traveling at 4c for 9 years.
> No, no, I'm not contradicting myself.
> It is not the same for physicists who are still fighting among 
> themselves, because they have not understood the beauty, the clarity and 
> the evidence of the theory stripped of its conceptual dust. Because for 
> them again: ignorance is strength. But whose ignorance for whose strength?

Richard, you need to see a psychiatrist.