Deutsch   English   Français   Italiano  
<v7hv3j$3u91q$1@dont-email.me>

View for Bookmarking (what is this?)
Look up another Usenet article

Path: ...!3.eu.feeder.erje.net!feeder.erje.net!weretis.net!feeder8.news.weretis.net!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: olcott <polcott333@gmail.com>
Newsgroups: comp.theory
Subject: Re: Hypothetical possibilities
Date: Sat, 20 Jul 2024 22:25:39 -0500
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 42
Message-ID: <v7hv3j$3u91q$1@dont-email.me>
References: <v7gl30$3j9fi$1@dont-email.me> <v7h1fl$3lcvq$3@dont-email.me>
 <v7h224$3li66$3@dont-email.me> <v7h3je$3lcvq$6@dont-email.me>
 <v7h55o$2a60$1@news.muc.de>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Injection-Date: Sun, 21 Jul 2024 05:25:40 +0200 (CEST)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="9ab67b95e26d71c9bf3d4bab69c0e6c7";
	logging-data="4138042"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1//gjqhfaMNnNUY1lPAEYXw"
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Cancel-Lock: sha1:Ymgp+UdVjeU99jjfUTzFH6/cUEY=
In-Reply-To: <v7h55o$2a60$1@news.muc.de>
Content-Language: en-US
Bytes: 2478

On 7/20/2024 3:03 PM, Alan Mackenzie wrote:
> [ Followup-To: set ]
> 
> In comp.theory Fred. Zwarts <F.Zwarts@hetnet.nl> wrote:
> 
> [ .... ]
> 
>> Olcott could not point to an error, but prefers to ignore it. So, I will
>> repeat it, until either an error is found, or olcott admits that HHH
>> cannot possibly simulate itself correctly.
> 
> This has the disadvantage of making your posts boring to read.  All but
> one poster on this newsgroup KNOW that Olcott is wrong, here.
> 
> Continually repeating your argument won't get him to admit he's wrong.
> Richard has been trying that for much longer than you have, with the
> same lack of success.  Olcott's lack of capacity for abstract reasoning,
> combined with his ignorance, combined with his arrogance, prevent him
> learning at all.
> 
> May I suggest that you reconsider your strategy of endless repetition?
> 
> Thanks!
> 

I have made slight changes to what I have been saying nearly every day.
This is my newest clearest way of saying it:

void DDD()
{
   HHH(DDD);
   return;
}

DDD correctly simulated by any pure function HHH cannot
possibly reach its own return instruction.


-- 
Copyright 2024 Olcott "Talent hits a target no one else can hit; Genius
hits a target no one else can see." Arthur Schopenhauer