Path: ...!weretis.net!feeder8.news.weretis.net!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Lynn McGuire <lynnmcguire5@gmail.com>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.c++
Subject: "Python is 71x Slower, Uses 75x More Energy, Than C" - YouTube
Date: Tue, 30 Jul 2024 19:05:28 -0500
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 10
Message-ID: <v8bv49$18i9h$1@dont-email.me>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Injection-Date: Wed, 31 Jul 2024 02:05:29 +0200 (CEST)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="fbb32664feebec233b057578b9f81531";
	logging-data="1329457"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX19Qps2+0k3nb3hd8lsqWo2Yuk0DmLB6aIQ="
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Cancel-Lock: sha1:NAI/VpkKzNPGDCRoaLj2T3xNGHM=
Content-Language: en-US
Bytes: 1241

"Python is 71x Slower, Uses 75x More Energy, Than C" - YouTube
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=U4c6nFGt1iM

I am not buying that C++ is slower than Rust.

The referenced paper is:
    https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0167642321000022

Lynn