Path: ...!local-2.nntp.ord.giganews.com!Xl.tags.giganews.com!local-1.nntp.ord.giganews.com!news.giganews.com.POSTED!not-for-mail NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 04 Jun 2024 21:28:46 +0000 From: BTR1701 Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv Subject: Re: Kamala Outright Lies About Women's Basketball Brackets References: <17d4370a814a9fe0$40$3919488$c2d58868@news.newsdemon.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=fixed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit User-Agent: Usenapp/0.92.2/l for MacOS Message-ID: Date: Tue, 04 Jun 2024 21:28:46 +0000 Lines: 139 X-Usenet-Provider: http://www.giganews.com X-Trace: sv3-DpB1pRB1Hch3o6eXhITd7K4/jYGswy1mMl6ShQasf0zw2Lb4eNTr5R1d04FmVPW2UL0Bhn3kaKvK0AJ!LcPk/Fs15/y6WEp8toaa2YMfrwMsec64JNszFPjkUEo1bIKMVTxhmEYZ7dnXayYsTNAAossEDI6i X-Complaints-To: abuse@giganews.com X-DMCA-Notifications: http://www.giganews.com/info/dmca.html X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint properly X-Postfilter: 1.3.40 Bytes: 7576 X-Original-Lines: 136 On Jun 4, 2024 at 8:35:23 AM PDT, "FPP" wrote: > On 6/3/24 10:43 PM, BTR1701 wrote: >> In article , FPP >> wrote: >> >>> On 6/3/24 1:06 PM, shawn wrote: >>>> On Mon, 3 Jun 2024 12:15:02 -0400, moviePig >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>>> On 6/3/2024 3:58 AM, trotsky wrote: >>>>>> On 6/2/24 7:41 PM, FPP wrote: >>>>>>> On 6/2/24 11:53 AM, trotsky wrote: >>>>>>>> On 6/2/24 8:25 AM, FPP wrote: >>>>>>>>> On 6/1/24 1:39 PM, trotsky wrote: >>>>>>>>>> On 6/1/24 11:26 AM, moviePig wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> On 6/1/2024 4:43 AM, trotsky wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>> On 5/31/24 5:34 AM, FPP wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>> On 5/31/24 4:16 AM, trotsky wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 5/30/24 9:53 AM, FPP wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 5/30/24 4:31 AM, trotsky wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 5/29/24 3:19 PM, BTR1701 wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Kamala Harris claimed that women's basketball wasn't even >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> allowed to have >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> playoff brackets until 2022, when in reality, women's >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> basketball has been >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> using them since 1982, 42 years. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Kamala herself tweeted out exchanges with her husband in >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2021 where they >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> talked about who they were choosing in their brackets. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://youtu.be/yYjH5g9ogXE?t=409 >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Between Biden's almost weekly made-up stories about his past >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and Kamala >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> gaslighting us about women's basketball, what the hell is >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> going on in the >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> White House? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> What the hell is going on with Trump's impending conviction? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Oh, and besides Trump who do you think makes the GOP look >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> worse, Santos or McCarthy? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Harris owned up to the mistake, and explained it... but you >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> won't hear that in Thanny's False Equivalency Gazette. >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> I'm not a fan of hers but she is upstanding in that way.  The >>>>>>>>>>>>>> GOP isn't upstanding in any way.  My biggest regret is that >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Trump likely won't be sentenced to jail time. >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Don't be too sure.  He's shown no remorse, and he did violate >>>>>>>>>>>>> gag orders 10 or 11 times.  Those are big mitigating circumstances. >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> I could see him serving weekends as a punishment.  And even >>>>>>>>>>>>> community service, which would absolutely humiliate him to death. >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Fact is, he's going to get some form of punishment. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Judge Merchan is very cool.  It's hard to read how he'll react on >>>>>>>>>>>> this one.  Your points are well taken though, he should be >>>>>>>>>>>> sentence accordingly for those reasons.  I'm thinking he'll get >>>>>>>>>>>> sentenced to home confinement with an ankle bracelet. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> The choice of punishment could reasonably consider a convict's >>>>>>>>>>> likelihood to re-offend.  Since Trump's conviction was ultimately >>>>>>>>>>> about election interference, the judge might notice that Trump >>>>>>>>>>> currently stands accused of at least two other instances of >>>>>>>>>>> exactly that. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Is that your supposition or have you heard that somewhere else? >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> It's all part of the calculation.  Trump is pushing his luck, and if >>>>>>>>> he gets time, it'll all be because he's been asking for it. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> I could see him doing weekends in jail.  That wouldn't hurt his >>>>>>>>> campaigning, and would teach him to shut his yap. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> To be fair anybody else in the world who acted as flagrantly as Trump >>>>>>>> would be hung out to dry--why should the fat orange weasel get any >>>>>>>> preferential treatment? >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> Because what the justice system gets away with in low profile cases >>>>>>> they can't get away with here. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> They're bending over backwards to avoid even the appearance of not >>>>>>> giving him every break possible. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Sure, it's stupid... because they're going to do it anyway. >>>>>> >>>>>> That's why I think home confinement with a really large ankle bracelet >>>>>> might be the choice >> >>>>> I wonder if they make bejewelled 24K ankle bracelets... >>>>> >>>> They don't really need any ankle bracelets since he's got the Secret >>>> Service protection. Plus he's not likely to skip the country. Most >>>> likely he would get home confinement to Mar-A-Largo which isn't really >>>> home confinement. Other than his inability to travel to do rallys. >>>> It's not like being confined to a 2 bedroom home. >>>> >>> Who says? You? >>> >>> Why aren't ankle bracelets needed? Is he special? Does the convict get >>> to choose his jailers now? >>> >>> Why Mar-a-Lago? Why not Trump Tower? >>> He committed the crime in New York. He was indicted and convicted in >>> New York. Why shouldn't he serve his sentence in (wait for it) New York? >>> >>> Who gets to pick? The convict? Is this what your legal instincts tell you? >>> Or are you just bullshitting in favor or your Dear Leader again? >> >> FYI- You're responding to Shawn-- who's generally sympathetic to Dems >> and on your side-- not me, you dumb fucktard. Look at the attributions >> from now on before going full froth. >> > > Sorry shawn... I had my bedtime eye ointment in, and must have missed > the attribution. > > Strike the last paragraph. The others are still relevant, though. > > Thanny: "Is this what your legal instincts tell you? > Or are you just bullshitting in favor or your Dear Leader again?" > > That's for YOU. Up to this point, I haven't commented on Trump's method of punishment AT ALL, so other than directly out of your ass, I have no idea where you're getting the "Or are you just bullshitting in favor or your Dear Leader again?" and assigning it to me.