Path: ...!weretis.net!feeder9.news.weretis.net!2.eu.feeder.erje.net!feeder.erje.net!feeds.news.ox.ac.uk!news.ox.ac.uk!nntp-feed.chiark.greenend.org.uk!ewrotcd!news.eyrie.org!beagle.ediacara.org!.POSTED.beagle.ediacara.org!not-for-mail From: RonO Newsgroups: talk.origins Subject: Re: California Dairy herds positive for the dairy virus Date: Sat, 14 Sep 2024 20:27:20 -0500 Organization: A noiseless patient Spider Lines: 267 Sender: to%beagle.ediacara.org Approved: moderator@beagle.ediacara.org Message-ID: References: Reply-To: rokimoto557@gmail.com MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Injection-Info: beagle.ediacara.org; posting-host="beagle.ediacara.org:3.132.105.89"; logging-data="45822"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@beagle.ediacara.org" User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird To: talk-origins@moderators.isc.org Cancel-Lock: sha1:JXND2gT97TAUOTgjbu/RymBNAa8= Return-Path: X-Original-To: talk-origins@ediacara.org Delivered-To: talk-origins@ediacara.org id 625D122986F; Sat, 14 Sep 2024 21:27:13 -0400 (EDT) by beagle.ediacara.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3423F22978C for ; Sat, 14 Sep 2024 21:27:11 -0400 (EDT) id 4A4725DC75; Sun, 15 Sep 2024 01:27:25 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: talk-origins@moderators.isc.org by mod-relay-1.kamens.us (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 099585DC6C for ; Sun, 15 Sep 2024 01:27:25 +0000 (UTC) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (P-256)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.eternal-september.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5E8155F87D for ; Sun, 15 Sep 2024 01:27:22 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: name/5E8155F87D; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=gmail.com id EE207DC01BA; Sun, 15 Sep 2024 03:27:21 +0200 (CEST) X-Injection-Date: Sun, 15 Sep 2024 03:27:21 +0200 (CEST) Content-Language: en-US In-Reply-To: X-Auth-Sender: U2FsdGVkX19UmHU42+S5LIrRGEXh5x0z/q9tWHIiJuw= FORGED_GMAIL_RCVD,FORGED_MUA_MOZILLA,FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN, FREEMAIL_FROM,FREEMAIL_REPLYTO_END_DIGIT,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, NML_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED,RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_CERTIFIED_BLOCKED, RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_RPBL_BLOCKED,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 smtp.eternal-september.org Bytes: 16973 On 9/14/2024 6:12 PM, x wrote: > On 9/14/24 15:23, RonO wrote: >> On 9/12/2024 11:59 AM, RonO wrote: >>> On 9/11/2024 12:05 PM, RonO wrote: >>>> On 9/8/2024 6:55 PM, RonO wrote: >>>>> On 9/7/2024 2:17 PM, RonO wrote: >>>>>> On 9/6/2024 5:34 PM, RonO wrote: >>>>>>> On 9/4/2024 8:23 PM, RonO wrote: >>>>>>>> 3 herds in California central valley have been found to be >>>>>>>> positive for the dairy virus. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> https://www.statnews.com/2024/08/29/california-nations-largest- >>>>>>>> milk- producer-discloses-possible-bird-flu-outbreaks-in-three- >>>>>>>> dairy-cow- herds/ >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> They claim that California workers are "usually" dedicated to >>>>>>>> just one herd so do not pick up shifts at nearby poultry farms, >>>>>>>> but months ago (before I retired in May) I noted that California >>>>>>>> had high levels of influenza virus in the waste water around the >>>>>>>> bay area.  At that time they had estimated that the virus first >>>>>>>> infected cattle Sept or Oct 2023, and they hadn't yet found >>>>>>>> viral sequence from herds infected that early in Texas.  When I >>>>>>>> looked into the avian influenza cases the Dairy virus was most >>>>>>>> similar to one isolated from a Peregrine falcon in California. >>>>>>>> California had high levels of influenza virus in their waste >>>>>>>> water (associated with infected herds in Texas and Michigan) and >>>>>>>> Commercial poultry farms started to go down in the central >>>>>>>> valley in Oct 2023 (the flocks get infected by the dairy >>>>>>>> workers).  A number of flocks went down within a few months >>>>>>>> working their way up North and around the bay area. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> I contacted a person at the Avian disease ARS station in >>>>>>>> Georgia, and tried to get the name of the person that would have >>>>>>>> the sequence data of the California samples (they had not been >>>>>>>> included in any of the dairy virus studies) but I was told that >>>>>>>> the USDA did not give out that information.  I told the guy that >>>>>>>> they needed to check out those samples, but his comment was that >>>>>>>> they were busy. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> My prediction is that when they sequence the central valley >>>>>>>> virus they could identify the region where the initial dairy >>>>>>>> infection occurred and it spread from California to Texas.  The >>>>>>>> virus spread rapidly out of Texas, but it probably came from >>>>>>>> somewhere else. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> The CDC and USDA would have identified many more states with >>>>>>>> infected herds by now if they had acted on the waste water data >>>>>>>> and the FDA identification of states with virus positive dairy >>>>>>>> products.  The Dairy workers are not being protected from being >>>>>>>> infected in states that refuse to identify their infected herds. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Ron Okimoto >>>>>>> >>>>>>> https://www.nbcnews.com/health/health-news/person-infected-bird- >>>>>>> flu- missouri-no-contact-animals-know-rcna170010 >>>>>>> >>>>>>> There has been a case of H5N1 in a human in Missouri, but this >>>>>>> person did not have contact with poultry or dairy cattle.  My >>>>>>> guess is that it is person to person transmission.  Missouri is >>>>>>> one of the states that has not verified any positive dairy herds >>>>>>> (no one has been looking), but Kansas and Oklahoma have positive >>>>>>> dairy herds. They have known that it was likely human >>>>>>> transmission into Kansas and North Dakota from Texas because >>>>>>> neither states got cattle from Texas, but both states got the >>>>>>> virus from Texas. Human to human transmission has probably been >>>>>>> going on for some time, but they never started contact tracing to >>>>>>> identify possibly infected herds nor to determine how the virus >>>>>>> was transmitted to the herds and poultry flocks that have been >>>>>>> infected. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Ron Okimoto >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> The virus is H5, but hasn't been confirmed to be the dairy virus. >>>>>> The article notes that Missouri hasn't claimed to have positive >>>>>> herds at this time, but commercial poultry flocks have gone down >>>>>> and that usually happens when the dairies are infected and dairy >>>>>> workers take it to the poultry farms.  Previous human cases had >>>>>> mild symptoms, but this person was hospitalized.  The USDA and CDC >>>>>> are still not doing anything to identify all the infected herds in >>>>>> states like Missouri, so nothing much has been done to minimize >>>>>> the exposure of dairy workers.  My guess is that an infected dairy >>>>>> worker infected this patient, and it is a case of human to human >>>>>> transmission. >>>>>> >>>>>> Ron Okimoto >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> As stupid as it may be the CDC response to the latest human >>>>> infection without contact with animals is worse than can be >>>>> imagined.  They did not send a team to investigate, and have not >>>>> started contact tracing and testing of close contacts.  It seems >>>>> crazy when you think that the person was hospitalized, and this is >>>>> obviously a serious case of infection.  What they do not want is >>>>> the 50% human mortality associated with the H5N1 virus to become a >>>>> reality for the dairy virus.  The CDC continues to do nothing but >>>>> monitor the disease in two states, which is just nuts.  They are >>>>> actually waiting for it to become a noticeable problem somewhere >>>>> else before starting to do anything in other states. >>>>> >>>>> https://www.statnews.com/2024/09/08/missouri-h5-bird-flu-case- >>>>> questions- cat-raw-milk/ >>>>> >>>>> Ron Okimoto >>>>> >>>>> R >>>>> >>>> https://medicalxpress.com/news/2024-09-missouri-resident-bird-flu- >>>> livestock.html >>>> >>>> This ariticle seems to be trying to downplay the possibility of >>>> human to human transmission.  The Texas antibody testing of dairy >>>> workers have already come out with evidence for human to human >>>> transmission because one of the workers positive for H5 antibodies >>>> did not have contact with cattle, and only had contact with other >>>> dairy workers. There was also the case of the indoor cat in Colorado >>>> that was probably infected by humans.  The states that did not get >>>> cattle from affected states, but still got the dairy virus were >>>> likely infected by human dairy workers migrating to those states. >>>> Kansas got infected from Texas, and then Dakota got infected with >>>> the strain in Kansas, and Kansas did not get cattle from Texas, and >>>> South Dakota did not get cattle from Kansas.  The CDC has known this >>>> since about the beginning of detecting the infections in April, but >>>> they never started human contact tracing to determine how all the >>>> dairy herds and poultry flocks were being infected. >>>> >>>> Humans have been transmitting the virus since the start of this >>>> fiasco. Humans could have brought the virus into Texas.  The Texas >>>> Dairy worker that was the first infection had a virus that had >>>> branched off earlier than the strain that infected Texas.  They >>>> never got the name of that dairy worker, so they couldn't ask him >>>> where he could have been infected.  He could have been infected in >>>> the state that was the origin of the dairy infection.  One of his >>>> fellow dairy workers could have been infected in that same state, >>>> but brought in the Texas strain (one with more substitutions than >>>> the strain that infected the first dairy worker). >>>> >>>> Ron Okimoto >>>> >>> >>> New Texas Waste water data indicates that H5N1 seems to have started >>> to be detected in 10 Texas cities monitored in March 2024 (when the >>> Texas Dairy infections were first detected) but were not found in >>> samples taken earlier in the year.  This study used a detection >>> method that uses a probe to pull out the influenza RNA from the waste >>> water, so they can get the sequence of RNA and determine what strain >>> of influenza they are picking up.  Even though there was no ========== REMAINDER OF ARTICLE TRUNCATED ==========