Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Woozy Song Newsgroups: comp.os.linux.advocacy Subject: Re: Alternative to Optical Storage???? Date: Sun, 29 Sep 2024 17:47:58 +0800 Organization: A noiseless patient Spider Lines: 13 Message-ID: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Injection-Date: Sun, 29 Sep 2024 11:48:07 +0200 (CEST) Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="a729c1186d2d020b02abed3f31bb8141"; logging-data="1804114"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX18ZQuVK71QJY4FLTTeuUwuH2GQi1YmKW5U=" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/91.0 SeaMonkey/2.53.19 Cancel-Lock: sha1:ulvYMwuJDH9mXyURzxePD9MmkwU= In-Reply-To: Bytes: 1555 Nux Vomica wrote: > It seems that a lot of users are, irrationally, opposed to the > use of optical media for long-term archival storage. > > What, then, are some alternatives for the general user who does > not command the BIG $BUCKS necessary for enterprise grade solutions. > > Tape? Not likely. > I got a used server on Gumtree that had an LTO-5 drive in it. Snapped it up, as it was listed for $150. Seller didn't think the tape was worth anything.