Deutsch   English   Français   Italiano  
<vfflm0$77t$2@ereborbbs.duckdns.org>

View for Bookmarking (what is this?)
Look up another Usenet article

Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder2.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!ereborbbs.duckdns.org!.POSTED.192.168.18.6!not-for-mail
From: Kyonshi <gmkeros@gmail.com>
Newsgroups: comp.sys.ibm.pc.games.action
Subject: Re: EA vs FIFA; EA wins, everybody loses
Date: Fri, 25 Oct 2024 10:42:49 +0200
Organization: Erebor InterNetNews
Message-ID: <vfflm0$77t$2@ereborbbs.duckdns.org>
References: <960lhjp7rcs7ami6k0th6su7tqlalofe00@4ax.com>
NNTP-Posting-Host: c3066ed76bae8bcc0e476efb157ff758
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Injection-Date: Fri, 25 Oct 2024 08:42:40 -0000 (UTC)
Injection-Info: ereborbbs.duckdns.org; posting-host="192.168.18.6";
	logging-data="7421"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ereborbbs.duckdns.org"
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Content-Language: en-US
In-Reply-To: <960lhjp7rcs7ami6k0th6su7tqlalofe00@4ax.com>
Bytes: 1664
Lines: 14

On 10/24/2024 7:27 PM, Spalls Hurgenson wrote:

> 
> Which is unfortunate, because I really was hoping the squabble would
> sink _both_ brands. 

I doubt that whatever EA does in that regards would affect the FIFA 
brand that much. People aren't playing those games because they are FIFA 
games, people are playing them because they want to play football 
without getting off their couch.

Also FIFA is just not a good brand to begin with, they have exactly one 
meaningful product that people are really interested in, and that's 
football. Gamers long have learned to expect the worst about licensed 
games. The FIFA brand isn't necessarily that great a boon for a game.